Foreign Secretary
« Chirac/Merger Proposal | Back to most recent briefing | Hunting »
Asked about if the Foreign Secretary’s comments about the Iraqi casualties were "important or interesting" the PMOS replied that anything the Foreign Secretary said was important, but he was not sure if the journalist would regard the comments as breaking new ground, however.
Briefing took place at 11:00 | Search for related news
« Chirac/Merger Proposal | Back to most recent briefing | Hunting »
Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is
reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's
Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is
reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most
up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original
source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions.
Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright
Downing Street Says.
|
Anyone know what statement we’re talking about here? I can only assume it’s the response to the Lancet (100,000 excess deaths) report here:
http://www.fco.gov.uk/servlet/Front?pagename=OpenMarket/Xcelerate/ShowPage&c=Page&cid=1007029391629&a=KArticle&aid=1100183680513
which I’ve added some comments on at http://www.casi.org.uk/analysis/2004/msg00500.html
and whose arguments have been taken apart more fully elsewhere:
http://www.ex-parrot.com/~chris/wwwitter/20041102-_but_one_hundred_thousand_deaths_is_an_easily-abused_statistic.html#wcomment_00000355
http://www.crookedtimber.org/archives/002780.html
Or has there been another statement by Jack Straw on casualties?
Comment by Daniel O'Huiginn — 21 Nov 2004 on 9:25 am | Link