4 Comments »

1. People recite these media reports about IRA informants so called \x93STEAKNIFE\x94 but someone please explain to me (not whilst being tortured) how a supposed \x93national asset\x94 or \x93prized asset\x94 can have his life compromised by tabloid newspapers giving hints into their affairs in considering that any matter which involves the security of Her Majesties country is apparently entitled to be hushed up where the general public is concerned using laws governing the media. You have to wonder for what reason there could be security leaks – information that comes from – wait for it – someone employed in the security services, that is allowed to be printed in the press. Whether or not rightly named individuals have thereafter been \x93outed\x94 as being a steaknife. Now this man now that one. Is this how Her Majesties government protect their assets? What about protecting the general public\x92s assets? Now that there are, allegedly, no more steaknifes left to name (and no more IRA drug networks?) are we entitled to ask ourselves – what is it that this steaknife has actually done – supposing that he existed in the first place; no doubt there are plenty of IRA terrorists with a lot to say for themselves\x85A POLICE INQUIRY SHOULD BE COMMENCED AT ONCE

   Comment by MIROG — 31 Oct 2006 on 3:58 pm | Link

2. A leaked email copied from http://www.truthring.org/?p=2159 in reply to the above post by mirog.

   ………………………………………….

   9 October 2006

   The Prime Minster
   10 Downing Street
   London

   Dear Prime Minister Blair,

   In so much as I understand that it may not be appropriate in certain issues for a person of the general public to write to your office directly I am hoping that, given you have sufficient time available in your busy schedule, you will be able to content yourself with pondering upon my tale of misfortune such as I am about to describe and then please, if you find yourself able, allow me the benefit of your advice.

   I\x92m a 29 year old single male born of this land with ancestral links that lend me an interest in all of the peoples of the British Isles including Ireland. I was born in Dagenham, Essex \x96 a working class area \x96 where I have lived for the vast majority of the time since my birth. As you no doubt are aware Dagenham has always been a Labour stronghold and although I\x92m not intending to colour the intention of this letter with political views, so it is the case that I recognise the value of your party and of your leadership \x96 I voted Labour at a General Election.

   I find it unfortunate when I say to you that much of the problems I want to report to you are concerning my father, Rodney James Nixon, whom I have been led to understand is employed, or has had employment with the Army – 14 Intelligence Company. I\x92m further led to believe that my father has, or has had employment with other Intelligence agencies non-British and non-European.

   As far as I am aware my father also has occupation as a computer programmer. Currently I am a prospective professional artist (in the music industry) having previously been a professional golfer. Although my father is historically a Tory, I don\x92t believe I have a problem with him on that score. I am however of the impression that my father believes that I would like to see a Republic of Great Britain, whilst he is known to me to be a loyal supporter of the Monarchy. In any event I have regard for the European Union.

   Almost ten years ago now I was the unfortunate victim of a high speed road traffic accident which consequenced in injuries that stifled my short professional golf career before it had really got started. As is the normal course of things I sought legal advice and commenced in litigation for compensation as to loss of earnings. Proceedings were issued in 2000 and it was 3 more years before the matter reached Court. Unfortunately during the course of that personnel injury claim I had problems with the conduct of one of my own solicitors which, after an investigation, consequenced in a verdict of professional misconduct being entered against him by an adjudicator working for the Law Society. It appears that one problem led into another though what with other issues I will go on to describe the result being apparently one big but not insurmountable problem which turns around my father. I would say at this stage that I\x92m not entirely sure whether my fathers actions which I find disgraceful, where not repugnant and sometimes obtuse, are only in disregard for his parental obligations, or are further in keeping with a supposed duty as an Intelligence officer? Either or both I suggest that his employment in the civil structure which provides him the opportunity to continue interfering in my life causing me for the most part to suffer grave prejudice. You might wonder how or for what reason a person such as my father, given his employment, is likely to be interfering in my life. Afterall I\x92m not a criminal, nor a terrorist, and my fathers working for 14 Intelligence Company and interfering in my life is no grounds to assume as much. I pose a threat to him only in so far as he is a threat to me. Apparently however he has had the weight of his employer behind him, whereas I have to suffice with actions like this one.

   During my early twenties I had ongoing problems with people with whom I had become fairly well acquainted suggesting, mainly to others with whom I was also acquainted, that I was a Police informant, spy, murderer, terrorist and other fictitious insinuations which I do not wish to repeat. Quite franky I don\x92t feel that I am a suitable coat hanger for such suggestions to be reasonably directed at me and I was very amused in fact when I came across an opinion of a psychologist, Dr. Carl Gustav Jung, which related; he suggested that people (such people I compare to the acquaintances I have referred to) are apt to make \x91projections\x92 onto other people, psychologically speaking; as if they are talking about themselves when they were intending to state observations of the other. In any case I expect that Police informants and spies have a very important part to play in society however given the experiences with those people I have referred to above I also expect that there are such people who have particularly unpleasant ideas about how they could go about their lives, interfering with other peoples, what with the power that they have through their employment. Preventing terrorism and the death of innocent people is obviously a very commendable cause although I\x92m sorry to say that a person involved in terrorism, someone who doesn\x92t care whose lives he ruins, is hardly a nobleman where he has decided to \x93help\x94 the Police, or Security Services, just because it suits his own purposes. I know as well as anyone else that terrorist\x92s have an interest in crime and criminals and raising funding for their activities. It\x92s easy to see how a criminal in these circumstances can easily become involved in terrorism.

   Moving on, in or about May 2000 my father suggested to me that a \x93cult\x94 in America had taken an interest in him, from what time it commenced he didn\x92t say, and that he was being \x93followed about\x94 by them! Roughly at that time I was having my own unusual experiences with what I might also describe as a \x93cult\x94 \x96 such people saying and doing rather peculiar things, concerning themselves in my affairs.

   On 5 December 2003 Judgement was handed down by His Honour Judge Levy on my case for damages in loss of my professional golf career. Given the nature of the evidence as presented at Court and the overall conduct of the hearing I was very disappointed to be awarded only about \xA336,000 from a total claim of about \xA32.2 million. I made an Appeal on the grounds that 1) There was a serious procedural irregularity in that evidence was relied upon in the Judgement that the Defendant did not have permission to rely upon 2) The Judgement was wrong on the evidence, and 3) The Judgement was wrong on a point of law. Unfortunately I was thereafter made insolvent for solicitors costs before an Appeal (permission to Appeal first of all since permission to Appeal was refused by the Trial Judge) that been scheduled to be heard to take place at the Court Of Appeal. Representing myself I managed to have the insolvency rescinded however still awaiting notification of the Hearing for permission to Appeal it proceeded in my absence without any notice being received from the Court or the Defendant (who were represented at the hearing). Again I was made insolvent on solicitors costs the Appeal being unsuccessful in my absence.

   In or about May 2005 I made a very serious allegation to the Metropolitan Police regarding terrorism. Subsequent to that apparently not being investigated and other matters relating I decided to email the commissioner of the Met outlining concerns that I had with my personnel circumstances and terrorism. I am attaching a copy of that email (and also its attachment) for your perusal. Subsequent to dispatching that email to the commissioner and not receiving any reply I called the Crime Desk at Barking Police station whereupon I further discussed the allegation that I had made. During the course of the conversation I had with the Crime Desk I provided some substantiation to my allegations. However I can I substantiate the allegations further. If it is the case that the allegations that I made to the Police are not going to be investigated then I accept that that is the prerogative of the Police or whoever has jurisdiction over the matter. However I remain very concerned in the event that what I said is, I believe, true.

   Returning to the Court case of Nixon and Legg. As far as I am led to understand a number of witness statements were submitted in that case by the Defendant. I am further led to believe that they were done so, \x93not open to inspection\x94. In my not having the opportunity to inspect the statements at any stage and in considering my view that the Judgement in that case was not based on the evidence which was legal to be used such being that which was presented at Court, it would appear to be the case that such witness evidence had a bearing on the Judgement at considerable financial loss to myself. Of course I am very concerned about witness evidence being submitted secretly in that case because this suggests to me that 1) I am a threat to these people in some way 2) That Court agreed that these people had something to tell the Court that would necessarily result in me being a threat to them, and I do not have a criminal record 3) The four people whom I understand have given witness evidence in that case: Miss. Hollis, Mr. O\x92Leary, Mr. Fowler and Mr. Cooper, are to my knowledge all involved with my father in some way be it they work for him, or with him 4) The witnesses have been permitted to give evidence against me which, quite possibly, is fallacious and unsustainable however I have not been able to inspect that evidence nor question the witnesses as to show its validity and/or relevance, apparently on the grounds that it is not in the publics interest for those witnesses to be known to me as per paragraph 3. Further I suggest that such people, including my father, have a peculiar but unwarranted interest in my affairs in general, that such people are involved in the \x93cult\x94 previously described, and that such people are involved in 1. fraud.

   There is now the matter of my prospective career in the music industry. Having lost a professional golf career, which I must add I worked very hard for, I have made every effort in considering my circumstances to mitigate my losses pursuing a career as a record producer/engineer/DJ. Unfortunately however my career is being compromised by 1) Individuals who were involved in Defending my Court case, and 2) Individuals who have a relationship with my father i.e. they work for him, or with him 3) Individuals who are involved in a \x93cult\x94 as previously referred to, and 4) Individuals who are involved with the Police, or Security Services in an as yet unspecified way.
   I suggest that the actions of the following individuals are reasonable to be called 1. fraud:-

   1. Paul Cooper;
   2. Danny O\x92 Leary;
   3. Gavin Dunn;
   4. David Withers;
   5. Heidi Taylor;
   6. Tim Munden;
   7. Andy Swallow.

   Prime Minister if I am not going to be permitted to live my life in the Country of my birth because I supposedly pose a threat to certain individuals, my father for instance, because I am a lot more intelligent than they are, because I\x92m not the same as they are, perhaps because I have different views to them, and attempts are going to continue to be made to compromise me, dare I say retard me, disable me or even murder me, then please I must ask that someone advise me what I need to do to live the life that I am capable of living without uncalled for interference.

   I appreciate your taking the time to read this mail and would be grateful in your reply.

   Yours Sincerely,
   Robert J. Nixon"

   ………………………………………….

   Please post the reply from the PM if there is one.

   A police inquiry is appropriate.

   Comment by Arthur — 2 Nov 2006 on 2:13 pm | Link

3. In the months before the July 2005 bombings in London, England, information was given to the security services in regards to terrorism in the manner of a warning stating that something was going to happen. Over 50 people subsequently lost their lives. In reading the letter above addressed to the Prime Minister it is a great cause for concern that the information received implicates three people, one of whom is Rodney Nixon. Perhaps if anyone has the opportunity to post the Prime Minister’s reply to the young man’s letter above, then they might also be able to enlighten us what the nature of Rodney Nixon\x92s employment is as an "intelligence officer" in the British security services. As has been suggested elsewhere is this person THE "steak" and "knife" of the IRA? And what are his connections to the Ulster Defence Association? What are nature of his associations to Turkish and Pakistani drug dealers and not least what involvement does he have in Al qaeda? If these questions pose a security risk perhaps the government might like to "spy" on Rodney Nixon and his assosciates, including the two other names that were implicated in the July 2006 terrorist warning and whovever else is involved in his deluded satanic devil worshiping cult. If such action is unlikley to make any difference perhaps the government should consider revoking a ‘license to kill status’, which will render them accountable to Britsh law and custodial sentances which is sufficent detterent for the rest of us decent folk. If their not decent well then I suggest that we’re referring to a ring of some description.

   Comment by General Public — 20 Nov 2006 on 12:38 pm | Link

4. In the months before the July 2005 bombings in London, England, information was given to the security services in regards to terrorism in the manner of a warning stating that something was going to happen. Over 50 people subsequently lost their lives. In reading the letter above addressed to the Prime Minister it is a great cause for concern that the information received implicates three people, one of whom is Rodney Nixon. Perhaps if anyone has the opportunity to post the Prime Minister’s reply to the young man’s letter above, then they might also be able to enlighten us what the nature of Rodney Nixon\x92s employment is as an "intelligence officer" in the British security services. As has been suggested elsewhere is this person THE "steak" and "knife" of the IRA? And what are his connections to the Ulster Defence Association? What are nature of his associations to Turkish and Pakistani drug dealers and not least what involvement does he have in Al qaeda (and Mossad) and the 911 terrorist in the USA (as referred to in the letter above). If these questions pose a security risk perhaps the government might like to "spy" on Rodney Nixon and his associates, including the two other names that were implicated in the July 2005 terrorist warning and whoever else is involved in his deluded satanic devil worshiping cult, because it is they who are the threat. If such action is unlikely to make any difference perhaps the government should consider revoking a ‘license to kill status’, which will render them accountable to British law. Custodial sentences are sufficient deterrent for the vast majority of the British public.

   Comment by General Public — 20 Nov 2006 on 12:47 pm | Link

---

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Post a public comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required)
(You must give an email address, but it will not be displayed to the public.)
Website
(You may give your website, and it will be displayed to the public.)

Comments:

This is not a way of contacting the Prime Minister. If you would like to contact the Prime Minister, go to the 10 Downing Street official site.

Privacy note: Shortly after posting, your name and comment will be displayed on the site. This means that people searching for your name on the Internet will be able to find and read your comment.