» Friday, March 17, 2006Peerages
Asked what the status of Chai Patel’s peerage was, the PMOS replied that as he had said throughout, we would announce them whenever we were ready to announce them. As the Prime Minister had said yesterday, he had always abided by the recommendations of the Lords Appointments Commission, and he took those recommendations very seriously. Asked if the Lords Appointments Commission had the power to recommend that people should not be given a peerage, the PMOS said that the whole point of the Lords Appointment Commission was to make recommendations. Therefore, it was automatic that they had the power to say no as well as yes. It was for the Prime Minister, then, to either accept or reject what the Commission had said, but as the Prime Minister had said yesterday, he took their recommendations very seriously. Asked if we expected the full list of lenders to be published next week, the PMOS said that was entirely a party matter and he could not comment on that. He referred people to what the Prime Minister had said yesterday. Asked if the choice of Sir Hayden Phillips was agreed in consultation with the other political parties, the PMOS replied that the discussions went through the normal channels. Asked if that therefore implied that all the political parties would co-operate, the PMOS said that he did not want to talk for parties. The Prime Minister had always said that he believed that it was better and more acceptable to the public if we progressed on this matter on the basis of consensus. People underestimated the difficulties and dilemmas that there were, and expressed concern if parties got money from individuals. Equally, there was no great enthusiasm in terms of state funding. If money was received from other sources, however, then the question had to be: should the state contribute more? Those were issues, and people knew what were the difficult questions that had to be addressed, and we believed that this was a way of trying to reach a consensus in a reasonably short period. Sir Hayden Phillips’ terms of reference under which he would do his business would be announced next week. Put that in the past, the Prime Minister had not been keen on the idea of state funding, so had the events of the past week forced him to have a rethink, the PMOS replied that it was not a fair summary of the Prime Minister’s view. What the Prime Minister had set out in the past was precisely what the PMOS had set out which was that there were issues which had to be addressed. The funding of political parties was perfectly legitimate, and an essential part of any democracy. The question was how could it be done? We knew, and this week underlined it, that people had concerns even if the matter was handled entirely properly, when money was seen to come from either particular individuals or organisations, be they trade unions or others. Equally, however, there was a question of whether people wanted to see more state funding. If there was a situation in which political parties had to be funded in some way, then the best way to move forward would be on the basis of consensus. That would be what Sir Hayden Phillips’ main objective might be. It was more likely that people would get that consensus if there was an independent figure who was trying to reach it, rather than any individual parties. All the individual parties would quite rightly have their own view. Put that yesterday, the Prime Minister said that some of these issues could be dealt with very quickly, whilst the PMOS had said today that they could be dealt with "reasonably short period" which in Whitehall terms might be two years, the PMOS said that he was not going to get into limits or timetables. Briefing took place at 7:00 | Search for related news Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions. Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright Downing Street Says. |
The unofficial site which lets you comment on the UK Prime Minister's official briefings. About us...
Search
Supported byRecent Briefings
Archives
LinksSyndicate (RSS/XML)CreditsEnquiriesContact Sam Smith. |
No Comments »
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Post a public comment