» Wednesday, May 12, 2004

Civil Service cuts

Asked to comment on today’s FT report suggesting that the Government was rowing back on its Budget pledge to cut the number of Civil Servants, the PMOS said that the Budget’s contents remained unchanged. We would report on the issue in due course. Pressed as to whether the story was true in the light of Nick Raynsford’s comments yesterday, the PMOS said that Mr Raynsford’s words were on the record. We would be able to respond properly once we had reported on the issue. Asked if the Prime Minister would want to pay tribute to the 700,000 extra Civil Servants who had been employed by the Government, the PMOS said that Civil Servants were taken on to do necessary jobs. Put to him that the Chancellor had said in the Budget that 60,000 Civil Service posts were not necessary and should be cut, the PMOS said that obviously the issue would be addressed in areas where savings could be made through modernisation.

Briefing took place at 11:00 | Search for related news

3 Comments »

  1. How can you make savings ‘through modernisation’? Just because a system is more modern it doesn’t mean that you need less people to operate it.

    The discussions about civil service numbers are full of this meaningless twaddle. All parties are pledging to cut the number of civil servants but non of them have said why. Non of the parties have said which jobs will no longer need doing. Non of them have said how systems will be made more efficient to require less staff. Non of them have said how this will make life better for taxpayers.

    Public sector admin costs are tiny compared to overall public expenditure so why are politicians making such a big thing about how many civil servants they employ? There only seem two explanations to me. Either they have no understanding of public sector finances or they are just trying to throw up a smokescreen to cover up the billions of pounds that are wasted through politicians incompetence.

    On a final point, whatever happened to democratic choice? I want to vote for a party that will increase the public sector (renationalise transport, energy etc) not reduce it.

    Comment by Uncarved Block — 12 May 2004 on 9:11 pm | Link
  2. Civil Service jobs will get cut because they were boosted by the government during the last economic cycle to prop up growth and employment figures. Civil Service employment goes up and down with the spending cycle; always has, always will.

    Comment by Gregory Block — 14 May 2004 on 1:56 pm | Link
  3. Civil service numbers have been in a decline (with some short term fluctuations) for the past 25 years.

    People complain about the decline in the standard of public services but never seem to connect this to the decline in people engaged in delivering them. Too many years of thacherite brainwashing

    Comment by Uncarved Block — 14 May 2004 on 2:12 pm | Link

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Post a public comment

(You must give an email address, but it will not be displayed to the public.)
(You may give your website, and it will be displayed to the public.)

Comments:

This is not a way of contacting the Prime Minister. If you would like to contact the Prime Minister, go to the 10 Downing Street official site.

Privacy note: Shortly after posting, your name and comment will be displayed on the site. This means that people searching for your name on the Internet will be able to find and read your comment.

Downing Street Says...

The unofficial site which lets you comment on the UK Prime Minister's official briefings. About us...

Search


May 2004
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Apr   Jun »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Supported by

mySociety.org

Disruptive Proactivity

Recent Briefings


Archives

Links

Syndicate (RSS/XML)

Credits

Enquiries

Contact Sam Smith.

This site is powered by WordPress. Theme by Jag Singh