MPs’ Pay
« Fuel/Oil | Back to most recent briefing | Miscellaneous »
Asked why the Prime Minister thought it was important that MPs voted for a 2.25% pay rise, the Prime Minister’s Spokesman (PMS) replied that we had released a Written Ministerial Statement about this on 17th June which made clear that it was important that MPs set an example at a time of wider public sector pay restraint.
Asked what the Prime Minister had to say about the argument that there was no point having independent reviews if the conclusions of those reviews were then overruled, the PMS said that the Prime Minister would say that there was another consideration, which was the example that MPs set in relation to public sector pay more generally.
Put that the Government brushed aside reviews, the PMS said that in relation to MPs’ pay it was important to remember that Sir John Baker did propose an alternative mechanism, which was the mechanism that the Government supported; linking MPs’ pay to settlements for a basket was something that was considered by and, from memory, commented positively on by Mr Baker, as well as his central recommendation.
original source.
Briefing took place at 16:45 | Search for related news
« Fuel/Oil | Back to most recent briefing | Miscellaneous »
Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is
reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's
Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is
reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most
up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original
source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions.
Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright
Downing Street Says.
|
No Comments »
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Post a public comment