Zimbabwe Debate
« Prime Minister’s Written Ministerial Statement | Back to most recent briefing | House of Lords Reform/Peers Vote »
Asked if he saw a case for Foreign Office Ministers swiftly altering their diaries to enable a Commons debate on the situation, Mr Straw said he agreed that there should be a debate. Both Margaret Beckett and Ian McCartney wanted it, but it was difficult to change engagements already in Ministers’ diaries. The Leader said it was essential now that the regional partners of Zimbabwe, particularly South Africa, recognised the gravity of the situation and acted accordingly. Asked what they should do, he said that they should take steps to further isolate and put pressure on the Mugabe regime. It was now beyond the fraternal feelings of former freedom fighters.
He noted that South African had to cope with a very large number of refuges from Zimbabwe and economic disruption on its northern border.
Briefing took place at 15:00 | Search for related news
« Prime Minister’s Written Ministerial Statement | Back to most recent briefing | House of Lords Reform/Peers Vote »
Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is
reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's
Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is
reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most
up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original
source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions.
Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright
Downing Street Says.
|
It is only prudent for someone in authority and I think the Prime Minister is the appropriate person to set up an formal framework defining how the participants debating the crisis in Zimbabwe should interact.
Debate is a broder form of argument than logical argument (much of what is there at the moment). Debate includes persuasion which appeals to the emotions and motivates enabling people to discuss and decide on differences.
I believe the quality and depth of such a debate improves the knowledge and skill of its participants.
Also with such a framework the out come of the debate may be decided by audience vote or simple judgement or even both.
Comment by Victor Simbule — 6 Jun 2007 on 12:53 pm | Link