Downing Street Says » Deputy Prime Minister

Asked if he could shed any light on the Deputy Prime Minister’s day, the Prime Minister’s Official Spokesman (PMOS) said that the Deputy Prime Minster’s office had issued a statement and he had nothing to add to that. Put to him that people close to the Deputy Prime Minster had said he was close to walking away, the PMOS said that it was not for him to give a running commentary on what people said on Sky News, if he did that he would be here all day, mainly correcting the numerous inaccuracies. The Deputy Prime Minster had a job to and he would get on with that. The Prime Minister believed that the Deputy Prime Minster’s years of experience in Government were hugely valuable in resolving issues which were cross-departmental. Therefore he brought a lot to the important role of chairing Cabinet Committees.

Asked if the Prime Minister had spoken to the Deputy Prime Minster today, the PMOS said that he would stick to his usual convention of not commenting on discussions between the Prime Minister and his Cabinet colleagues. He would say however that he was not aware of any specific discussions.

Asked if the Prime Minister acknowledged the Deputy Prime Minster was damaging the Labour party, the PMOS said that he didn’t comment on party matters.

Asked if the Prime Minister had spoken to Sir John Bourn or Sir Gus O’Donnell about the Deputy Prime Minister, the PMOS said that nothing had changed since this morning.

Asked if the Deputy Prime Minster registering his visit to the US was an acknowledgement of the appearance of impropriety, the PMOS said that the Deputy Prime Minster’s statement gave the reasons for his decision. The Prime Minister’s view was that this dealt with the matter. Put to him that the standards of the ministerial code were different from those of the register of members interests, the PMOS said that, as he had said this morning, the important thing was that the Deputy Prime Minster had not decided the planning application in this case, that had been decided by the local council. The Deputy Prime Minster did not decided individual licenses, that was done by the Gambling Commission and would actually be the subject of a vote in the House of Commons. Thirdly, as the Deputy Prime Minister had pointed out, his meeting with Mr. Anschutz had not taken place until after the contract on the sale of the Dome had been agreed.

Asked if he was saying that the Deputy Prime Minster had no involvement whatsoever with gambling or setting up casinos, the PMOS said that the question he was asked this morning related to the specific case of whether the Deputy Prime Minster was the one who decided the planning application in this case. The answer to that had been no. In response to the question of who granted gambling licenses in this case, the answer again was no. Asked if he was saying that he had no involvement whatsoever, the PMOS said that people were just as capable as him at looking back at the Deputy Prime Minster’s duties.

Asked if he was saying that the Deputy Prime Minster and Mr. Anschutz had never discussed the terms of the Dome deal, the PMOS said that the ODPM had set out what the Deputy Prime Minster had to say and he had nothing further to add to that. He would re-iterate that the Prime Minister’s view was that there was absolutely nothing wrong whatsoever in discussions between a senior government minister and a large investor in this country. Asked why they couldn’t have just met in an office with civil servants present, the PMOS said that the ODPM had set out the circumstances of the meeting and the Deputy Prime Minster had decided to register it.

Asked for the process by which matters were referred to Sir John Bourn, the PMOS said that he it was clearly spelled out in the terms of reference and he was not going to get into hypothetical cases. What we had said at the time was the process was as it had to be. The Prime Minister had to remain the ultimate guarantor of the ministerial code. We had never suggested otherwise because ultimately the person who decided the future of ministers had to be someone who was accountable to Parliament and through Parliament to the people. Asked if it wouldn’t be better for public confidence if Sir John Bourn investigated, the PMOS said that we made proper decisions based on what the actual assessment of the situation warranted and not what the media wanted.

Put to him that the terms of reference for Sir John Bourn’s job said that the Prime Minister may ask the independent advisor to the establish the facts in certain cases concerning the ministerial code and asked if the Prime minister had asked him to do that in this case, the PMOS said that he wasn’t going to give a running commentary on Sir John Bourn’s work. That shouldn’t be read one way or the other.

Asked if there was not a conflict of interest then why was it being registered, the PMOS said that ODPM had set out the reasons. Put to him that under the current system the first anyone would get to know about an investigation by Sir John Bourn was when it was finished, the PMOS said that he would not get into hypothetical questions, put to him that it wasn’t necessarily hypothetical since we for all anyone knew the Prime Minister had already asked for an investigation, the PMOS said that he thought he had been pretty clear on the matter. Asked if he believed that the public should be informed if Sir John Bourn were investigating a minister, the PMOS said that we should deal with matters as they arose.

Asked if either the Deputy Prime Minster or his permanent secretary asked for the advice of Sir John Bourn, the PMOS said that was not for him to comment on, but he would not encourage that line of thought.

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Post a public comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required)
(You must give an email address, but it will not be displayed to the public.)
Website
(You may give your website, and it will be displayed to the public.)

Comments:

This is not a way of contacting the Prime Minister. If you would like to contact the Prime Minister, go to the 10 Downing Street official site.

Privacy note: Shortly after posting, your name and comment will be displayed on the site. This means that people searching for your name on the Internet will be able to find and read your comment.

Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions. Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright Downing Street Says.

» Wednesday, July 5, 2006

Deputy Prime Minister

No Comments »

Post a public comment

Search

Supported by

Recent Briefings

Archives

Links

Syndicate (RSS/XML)

Credits

Enquiries