» Monday, November 20, 200690 Days
Asked why the Attorney General was not satisfied with the evidence presented to him for the case for 90 days’ detention when the Prime Minister had seen the evidence the last time it was raised, and that the Prime Minister said it had been comprehensive and detailed, the PMOS said that he was not aware that the Attorney General had spoken on the record on the matter, but in terms of moving forward we would do so on an evidential basis. We would talk to the police and others and would come to a view. The PMOS also said that, like last time, people come at this from different perspectives, and we would try and move forward on the basis of a consensus, but it would be best to see first and foremost what the evidential basis puts forward. Briefing took place at 9:00 | Search for related news Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions. Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright Downing Street Says. |
The unofficial site which lets you comment on the UK Prime Minister's official briefings. About us...
Search
Supported byRecent Briefings
Archives
LinksSyndicate (RSS/XML)CreditsEnquiriesContact Sam Smith. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No Comments »
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Post a public comment