John Prescott
« ID Cards Bill | Back to most recent briefing | Ashok Kumar »
Asked if the Prime Minister had told John Prescott his timetable, the PMOS referred journalists to the John Prescott’s words at PMQs. Asked what those words meant, the PMOS said that was for them to work out. Asked if he was suggesting that the public should engage in a guessing game as to when the Prime Minister was leaving, the PMOS said that John Prescott, as always, spoke for himself.
Briefing took place at 9:00 | Search for related news
« ID Cards Bill | Back to most recent briefing | Ashok Kumar »
Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is
reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's
Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is
reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most
up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original
source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions.
Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright
Downing Street Says.
|
How much longer can this unemployed crook stay in his ‘position’ at the expense of the British public?
Comment by ROD HARRIS — 6 Jul 2006 on 10:17 pm | LinkHow much longer can this unemployed crook stay in his ‘position’ at the expense of the British public?
Comment by ROD HARRIS — 6 Jul 2006 on 10:18 pm | Linkwhy did mr prescott say that he did not agree with saddams death penalty.let me say this what did he do to the man who threw an egg at him,he retalited and threw a punch which could have killed him,if this man had fell and hit his head.would he then had been charged we all know the answer that is no,he would have claimed self defence.what about the poor children who were gassed and all the others who were poisoned,was that self defence by saddam.this is why law and order is down the swanny in this country,take away punnishment and what happens, the lord god said that in the last days iniquity will abound,men with men women with women.children will be disobedience to their parents,things have got out of hand but government say no it has not but improved,yes and i am a chinaman.wake up peoplethe death penalty should be,and before i finish this is what prophecy says that the true sabbath keepers would be put in jail and some put to death before that great and terrible day says the lord.so you must now realize you will bring it back for the lord god has said it,and god do not lie,may god be with you.
Comment by brian palfrey — 2 Jan 2007 on 2:52 pm | Linkwhy did mr prescott say that he did not agree with saddams death penalty.let me say this what did he do to the man who threw an egg at him,he retalited and threw a punch which could have killed him,if this man had fell and hit his head.would he then had been charged we all know the answer that is no,he would have claimed self defence.what about the poor children who were gassed and all the others who were poisoned,was that self defence by saddam.this is why law and order is down the swanny in this country,take away punnishment and what happens, the lord god said that in the last days iniquity will abound,men with men women with women.children will be disobedience to their parents,things have got out of hand but government say no it has not but improved,yes and i am a chinaman.wake up peoplethe death penalty should be,and before i finish this is what prophecy says that the true sabbath keepers would be put in jail and some put to death before that great and terrible day says the lord.so you must now realize you will bring it back for the lord god has said it,and god do not lie,may god be with you.
Comment by brian palfrey — 2 Jan 2007 on 2:52 pm | Link