Chris Huhne
« International Monetary Fund | Back to most recent briefing | Super injunctions/privacy law »
Asked if the Prime Minister had spoken to Chris Huhne about the allegations against him and if it was the case that the Energy Secretary should step aside, the PMS said that he did not normally go into detail about conversations the Prime Minister had with Cabinet members. The position was as set out on Monday: Chris Huhne had denied all allegations and welcomed a police investigation.
Asked if the Prime Minister had full confidence in Chris Huhne, the PMS said yes.
original source.
Briefing took place at 10:00 | Search for related news
« International Monetary Fund | Back to most recent briefing | Super injunctions/privacy law »
Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is
reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's
Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is
reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most
up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original
source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions.
Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright
Downing Street Says.
|
To Honourable Elected Members of Parliament,
I would like to comment on today’s revelations in the press regarding
comments from today’s long awaited enquiry into injunctions.
It is the right of the people in the United Kingdom to speak with
members of parliament freely and without fear of any Judicial
dictatorship preventing this from happening.
As an elected member of Parliament Parliamentary privilege is a right
of elected members of parliament to disclose to parliament any
miscarriages of justice or any wrongdoings you see fit to bring to
parliaments attention, again without fear.
It has been reported a member of parliament may be in contempt of
court for doing so. I am aghast at the thought of selected Judges
running the United Kingdom and bypassing elected members who are
serving the people, it,s bad enough when this happens to
whisleblowers, you may think as a member of parliament there are laws
for protection of whistleblowers,
Well think again a judge without evidence and listening to evidence
from only one party can make a decision in secret to place an
injunction against the whistleblower.
I place a scenario to you! consider more options. there are many available.
A lawyer asks a judge in secret chambers etc he says he has a client who
has broken the law ( murder for example ), ( or take your pick on anything
that a client has done which is illegal, ) and the lawyer wants an
injunction to prevent anyone finding out about his clients law breaking!!!
Normal people would say a judge wont give out an injunction, but how
do you know?
Consider any Judge is elected into position to uphold the law without
favour and make judgement open justice, this is for a reason,
transparency!
Without transparency a judge could have already granted such an
injunction as above protecting a person who has committed murder, I
can suggest this as injunctions are everywhere now.”
Well what about corporates who break the law and hide behind Hyper
injunctions, without police and regulators having access to
investigate wrongdoings the judiciary are now involved in a conspiracy
with the corporate to cloak events , these judges should be brought to
account by parliament, no corporate power should hide behind
injunctions.
As members of parliament you are one of 650 who hold the balance of
democracy in this country, we have the right to speak with members of
parliament without fear, and members of parliament have the right to
free speech without fear in parliament.
I ask you all to rise up and protect our freedom, demand The Prime
Minister to act. Do not let the Judiciary wipe out centuries of
parliamentary and peoples rights.
I declare I have a vested interest in this topic but for the moment
can not say what.
kind regards
Brian Bradford
Comment by Brian Bradford — 21 May 2011 on 12:03 am | Link