Big Society
« Pope’s Visit | Back to most recent briefing | Big Society »
Asked about Liverpool City Council officially withdrawing from the Big Society project, the Prime Minister’s Spokesman (PMS) told the assembled press that it was something we were looking into.
We were looking into what the particular issues were and whether there were barriers and problems in that particular project. The PMS added that we were trying to do something new and something slightly different and the point of these pilots was to see what would work.
original source.
Briefing took place at 15:45 | Search for related news
« Pope’s Visit | Back to most recent briefing | Big Society »
Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is
reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's
Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is
reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most
up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original
source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions.
Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright
Downing Street Says.
|
When considering the public’s reaction to the Budget proposals, can the P.M. (and the Chancellor) realise that whilst many, or indeed most, recognize the need for prudent fiscal measures to correct the deficit, there is a widespread belief that there are far too many well-off folk are misusing the system and exploiting loop-holes in the tax system. To bring the Big Society on board what is needed is a well publicised set of firm proposals to tighten the regime exploiting overseas residence and the like. If we are all in it, then why should a few be able to employ skilled accountants and make a mockery of our tax system? A new set of simple rules which gave no opportunities for claiming British citizens’ rights but not paying for domestic taxes at home would do a wonder for improving the public’s acceptance that the Government was dealing fairly with the whole of society.
If it seems to be fair, it will ease the acceptance of the necessary new tax levels, etc.
Comment by Robin Bradbury — 6 Feb 2011 on 2:59 pm | Link