Forest Consultation
« Economy | Back to most recent briefing | Nimrod »
Put that if charities or councils did not have enough money to buy areas of forests, wouldn’t the land be bought up by wealthy individuals, the PMS replied that we had begun a consultation today and there seemed to be a lot of preconceptions about what we were saying. The Government would not be selling off heritage’ forests to the highest bidder or removing public access to land as some of the media coverage had suggested. The PMS added that we would be listening to peoples’ views on the issues and then setting out our conclusions.
Asked who would be buying the areas of forest, the PMS said that it would be a range of different organisations, such as private sector organisations, charities and community groups.
original source.
Briefing took place at 10:00 | Search for related news
« Economy | Back to most recent briefing | Nimrod »
Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is
reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's
Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is
reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most
up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original
source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions.
Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright
Downing Street Says.
|
My local forest is owned by a private company and despite there being a covenant on the land, which was bequeathed to the general public by Lord Lever, restricting any commercial development the company pushed through a planning application for a Go Ape Tree Access business. The local public fought hard to prevent this but failed because planning permission had been given without full public consultation. No private company that I know of buys anything without wanting to generate a profit from housing, cafes, hotels etc.
Comment by Evelyn Griffiths — 3 Feb 2011 on 8:37 pm | LinkI would like to be involved in the forest consultation. Please can you send me information on how i can become involved
Regards
Gareth Perry
Comment by gareth perry — 4 Feb 2011 on 5:02 pm | LinkKingston Upon Thames
KT1 3QS
Despite only 18% of forest is under public ownership across the country, in East Suffolk, the vast majority of forest is publicly owned and managed by the Forestry Commission. I am frankly dismayed that my local forest, Rendlesham would be considered for sale. The Forestry Commission manage Rendlesham forest in an exemplary manner, providing very high levels of access throughout the year, keep it tidy and safe for recreational use of walkers, cyclists, and horse riders. I could not imagine how these levels of access could be achieved in what is primarily a commercial forest, by any other organisation. IF IT AIN’T BROKE DON’T FIX IT. This simple adage should really apply when your proposals are not about cost as seen in the DEFRA impact assessment and nobody seems to be complaining about their management. In these difficult times please devote your time in finding cost savings and stop wasting money on pointless consultations. Leave our forests as they are managed by the experts.
Comment by stephen young — 6 Feb 2011 on 1:58 pm | LinkRegarding comment number 2 above.
In order to take part in the consultation, one can visit the following web page.
http://www.forestry.gov.uk/forestry/INFD-8D3G4M
That is in the following webspace.
http://www.forestry.gov.uk/
I hope that this helps.
William Overington
13 February 2011
Comment by William Overington — 13 Feb 2011 on 12:21 pm | Link