» Monday, December 17, 2007

Tripartite Structure

Asked if it was recognised that the Treasury and the Chancellor were looking to gain more control of the way crises were dealt with and that there should be a clear chain of command rather than a battle of command between the Treasury, the Financial Services Authority (FSA) and the Bank of England, the PMS said, as the Chancellor had done, that we would not come forward with any proposals in this area until the Treasury Select Committee, which was also looking at the matter, had completed its investigation, (expected in the New Year). The Chancellor was also appearing before the Treasury Select Committee in the New Year.

Asked if it was the case that the Prime Minister was determined that the tripartite structure that he put in place would not change, the PMS said that the Chancellor had already said that we were looking at the operation of the tripartite system, as were the Treasury Select Committee, and that, as the Chancellor had also said, he intended to wait for the Treasury Select Committee to report first; he would not bring forward any of his proposals until we had heard what the Treasury Select Committee had to say on the matter.

Put that in that case there was a distinction between the operation of the structure and looking at the structure, the PMS referred journalists to what the Chancellor had previously said that there was no question of any distinction between the Prime Minister and the Chancellor on this; they were on exactly the same page.

Asked if we were on the same page as the Bank of England, the PMS said that the Treasury and the Bank of England were working extremely closely together on this and all other relevant matters, as you would expect.

original source.

Briefing took place at 11:00 | Search for related news


  1. The tripartite fail to work as a whole. It could have been better if the issues were given action right away.

    Comment by Ed Ward — 10 Apr 2011 on 10:44 am | Link
  2. Looking back on this, it’s clear the structures were not going to work. At the time the PM and the Labour government were just foundering. We’re not out of the danger zone yet though.

    Comment by Sammy-J - Fascinators — 11 Apr 2011 on 1:01 pm | Link
  3. I agree with Sammy. The benefit of hindsight we have today clearly tells us that it was doomed to fail.

    Comment by Daniel Browning, Jr. — 14 Apr 2011 on 12:55 pm | Link
  4. Like everyone else, tripartite won’t work. There’s no certain chain of command.

    Comment by Albert Divo — 22 Apr 2011 on 5:50 am | Link
  5. I don’t really understand about this explanation because I am blind in finance problem. I just hope that it will not bring a great impact in economical condition because it will carry more problems in people’s lives today. Just hope the best for our condition.

    Comment by Lazaro — 30 Apr 2011 on 4:07 am | Link

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Post a public comment

(You must give an email address, but it will not be displayed to the public.)
(You may give your website, and it will be displayed to the public.)


This is not a way of contacting the Prime Minister. If you would like to contact the Prime Minister, go to the 10 Downing Street official site.

Privacy note: Shortly after posting, your name and comment will be displayed on the site. This means that people searching for your name on the Internet will be able to find and read your comment.

Downing Street Says...

The unofficial site which lets you comment on the UK Prime Minister's official briefings. About us...


December 2007
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Nov   Jan »

Supported by


Disruptive Proactivity

Recent Briefings



Syndicate (RSS/XML)



Contact Sam Smith.

This site is powered by WordPress. Theme by Jag Singh