» Wednesday, January 17, 2007Big Brother
Put that the Big Brother situation appeared to be getting more serious, and was it turning into a diplomatic incident, and therefore, was there any more that could be done at this end to address the issue, the PMOS said that the Prime Minister had not seen Big Brother, and therefore, none of what he said would be a commentary on the Prime Minister’s view of the programme, as it would not be right for him to offer an opinion. What clearly was to be regretted, and countered, was if there was any perception abroad that in any way we tolerated racism in this country. What the response to the programme had shown was precisely the opposite and that there was no level of toleration in this country for anything which rightly or wrongly was perceived as racism. Therefore, the message should go out from the UK loud and clear that we were a tolerant country and that we would not tolerate racism in any way. Asked if that was the Prime Minister’s view, the PMOS said that as people could see from the Indian media coverage, there was a lot of tension on this, and therefore, what in no way did we want was the perception that in any way racism was tolerated in the UK. Put that given the furore at PMQs today, would the Prime Minister now find the tape and watch the programme, the PMOS said that it was not the Prime Minister’s job to act as commentator on programmes. What his role was, however, was to say what was fact: that this country did not in any way tolerate racism. The PMOS added that that was not in any way a judgement on the programme itself, as the Prime Minister would not be getting involved with it. Asked if the comments about the Big Brother programme could be attributed to the PMOS, speaking for the Prime Minister, the PMOS said that that was what it said on the tin! Asked if there had been any contact at an ambassadorial level in India, the PMOS said that he was not aware of any. However, the Indian Government was well aware of our position. Asked what had changed since 1100 this morning and PMQs, and had the Prime Minister been made aware of what was happening, the PMOS replied that there was not a difference in our message, and that was that this country in no way tolerated racism. It was important that in India, that message was being conveyed loud and clear, and indeed, the Chancellor had done that in his visit there. Asked if any prominent businessmen or sportsmen had expressed their concerns, the PMOS said that he was not aware of any. Put that Paddy Ashdown had suggested that one way that the UK could express their support would be to vote for the alleged victim, the PMOS said that that would involve watching the programme. Asked if the PMOS thought that it was absurd that the Chancellor on an important visit to India had to make an apology for what had gone out on Big Brother, the PMOS replied that he had not doubt that the Chancellor would be speaking about other matters at length. What was important was that people did not believe that people in the UK tolerated racism. That was the serious side of this issue, and therefore, people would make up their own minds about the programme, but they should not be in any doubt at all about our opposition to racism. Briefing took place at 15:00 | Search for related news Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions. Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright Downing Street Says. |
The unofficial site which lets you comment on the UK Prime Minister's official briefings. About us...
Search
Supported byRecent Briefings
Archives
LinksSyndicate (RSS/XML)CreditsEnquiriesContact Sam Smith. |
had Sholpa been welsh/scottish would there have been all of this fuss?? no
Comment by em — 26 Jan 2007 on 11:19 pm | Link