» Monday, May 15, 2006

Criminal Justice System

Put that in his speech this morning, the Prime Minister was admitting that after nine years, there was still a huge problem with the Criminal Justice System, and what had gone wrong, the PMOS said that he did not want to comment directly on this morning’s speech, as it was a party speech. However, the Prime Minister had been quite open in the past about saying that the Criminal Justice System was part of the public administration, which in his view whenever he came to office, was least fit for purpose. In terms of various measures that had been taken over the years, much had changed in that time. The essential point that the Prime Minister was making was that there did need to be a switch in balance between the rights of the individual and the rights of the community as a whole. That was essentially where the Prime Minister’s analysis was at the moment.

Put that the Prime Minister had been talking about rebalancing the system for years, and why has none of it worked, the PMOS replied that yes, we had rebalanced the system more in favour of the victim, as opposed to the criminal, and we had taken measures to do that. Yes, we had rebalanced in other areas, but the Criminal Justice System had many different facets, and the same principle could be applied across the system. What we did not do in a system as complex as the Criminal Justice System was to pull one lever and suddenly everything fell into place, as life was not like that. It had to be addressed in lots of different ways. The PMOS said that in the same way, with the animal rights area, we had taken action, and we were now taking further action.

Put that he had had nine years, and how much longer would it take, the PMOS said that as he had said, the Criminal Justice System was the area which in the Prime Minister’s view required the biggest amount of work. If people looked at the way in which changes had happened, it was happening, but it was a highly complex area.

Asked when it would be finished, the PMOS replied when it was finished. Reform was one of those issues that went on and on.

Asked if the Prime Minister was thinking that he was going to "take on" vested interests like the legal professions or the police, the PMOS replied that he was not sure that he wanted to use the phrase "take on". Was the Prime Minister determined to bring about change? Yes. Was the Prime Minister bringing about change in the way police had occurred? Yes. There was the introduction of CSOs and the police were operating in a very different way than it was in the past. Equally, we needed to see where the analysis of this particular problem was by June, and then see where it took us. Was the Prime Minister afraid to challenge established procedures? No.

Briefing took place at 17:00 | Search for related news

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Post a public comment

(You must give an email address, but it will not be displayed to the public.)
(You may give your website, and it will be displayed to the public.)

Comments:

This is not a way of contacting the Prime Minister. If you would like to contact the Prime Minister, go to the 10 Downing Street official site.

Privacy note: Shortly after posting, your name and comment will be displayed on the site. This means that people searching for your name on the Internet will be able to find and read your comment.

Downing Street Says...

The unofficial site which lets you comment on the UK Prime Minister's official briefings. About us...

Search


May 2006
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Apr   Jun »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Supported by

mySociety.org

Disruptive Proactivity

Recent Briefings


Archives

Links

Syndicate (RSS/XML)

Credits

Enquiries

Contact Sam Smith.

This site is powered by WordPress. Theme by Jag Singh