3 Comments »

1. Why is there not more information on the call to reopen the 911 investigation? The only information available seems to be on the internet and there are a few dvd’s circulating such as Confronting the evidence funded by Jimmy Walters. There is a move forward in Venezuela, I have read on the 911scholarsfortruth.org website but not in any other media form in the UK . What is going on? What is England’s role in all of this? There are so many unanswered questions and so many people who are concerned and rightly so. can you please help enlighten me? Did I miss the breaking news headlines and follow up stories? Thankyou for taking the time to read this.

   Comment by Dina Allan — 15 May 2006 on 2:13 pm | Link

2. Why is there not more information on the call to reopen the 911 investigation? The only information available seems to be on the internet and there are a few dvd’s circulating such as Confronting the evidence funded by Jimmy Walters. There is a move forward in Venezuela, I have read on the 911scholarsfortruth.org website but not in any other media form in the UK . What is going on? What is England’s role in all of this? There are so many unanswered questions and so many people who are concerned and rightly so. can you please help enlighten me? Did I miss the breaking news headlines and follow up stories? Thankyou for taking the time to read this.

   Comment by Dina Allan — 15 May 2006 on 2:14 pm | Link

3. Easy answer, Dina; there isn’t more info on the call to re-open the 9/11 investigation because the media is as complicit as the US government. And for easy answers WHY the media (US & UK) are complicit, look at the corporate ownership and the people involved on the boards of most of the media companies and big "defence" (should be called "offence" these days) companies.

   Look at the following picture. This was displayed yet again on the BBC news homepage the other day, proof positive that the BBC is intent on continuing the lie as much as the Metropolitan Police are.

   http://www.met.police.uk/news/terrorist_attacks/groupcctv.jpg

   Now bear in mind that this is on the Met’s website. Remember also that this is one of the few bits of actual "evidence" the Met actually have.

   I’d suggest saving the picture to your PC, then open it with Photoshop or some other graphics software. Look at the guy at the back, with the white hat. Zoom in on his left arm, your right as you look. Notice the horizontal fence post running through his arm, as though he was standing behind the fence – which is behind him. How is that possible? Look also at the left side of his face – same thing. The fence post also extends into his face. Look at the face itself. So blurred that you can’t make out ANY detail at all – and yet he’s not THAT far away. This figure has been (badly) pasted into the picture. Now why would the Met feel the need to tamper with photographic evidence? For tampering there has been, of that there can be no doubt.

   See here for more analysis:

   http://worldpatriot.blogspot.com/

   Probably the most significant point to note is that it is the same Israeli security company (which has documented ties to Mossad – name of Verint) which provides security (and administers all the CCTV) for London railways stations & the Underground and also provided security for the World Trade Centre prior to 9/11.

   http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=69208

   Remember also that IF these "bombers" actually did arrive at Luton at the displayed time, there was still no way for them to get to Kings Cross in time because the train they should have caught was cancelled! This has been confirmed more than once by Thameslink; a google search will confirm that.

   http://www.financialoutrage.org.uk/thameslink_database.htm

   But I digress. There is no way that, even if they didn’t know about it at the time, the Met is unaware of the anomalies about these pictures – and yet they have not taken them down. Or said anything about them. Likewise, there can be no doubts that the mainstream media outlets are also aware of the quesionable elements. But they persist in propogating them.

   Conclusion? The media, and the police, are as aware as anyone with any sense is, that 7/7 was a false-flag operation, probably carried out by Mossad, in order to demonise Islam and gain public support for the "War on Terra". And oh look! There’s the USA, camped out on Iran’s doorstep, telling anyone daft enough to listen that Iran has nuclear weapons, despite the fact that they’ve only just started enriching uranium. And THAT’S why no info on 9/11 – because they want to keep the unthinking, non-reading sheeple in the dark. And it’s working – otherwise there’d be global cries of outrage. Remember, as they keep telling us; this is a "global village", with global problems etc. This is just part of that. 9/11, 7/7, Bali, Madrid, you name it, all part of the same game. Perpetuate the "War on Terra" – because war is big business, end of story.

   Incidentally, the above is not the only evidence of complicity; just the tip of the iceberg. I say that to forestall the ignorant cries of outrage from those who know no better who refuse to believe our "government" could stoop to such depths. I know a few such people – and every one has changed their tune when they actually took the time to look closely at some of the evidence.

   Comment by SmokeNMirrors — 17 May 2006 on 3:06 pm | Link

---

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Post a public comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required)
(You must give an email address, but it will not be displayed to the public.)
Website
(You may give your website, and it will be displayed to the public.)

Comments:

This is not a way of contacting the Prime Minister. If you would like to contact the Prime Minister, go to the 10 Downing Street official site.

Privacy note: Shortly after posting, your name and comment will be displayed on the site. This means that people searching for your name on the Internet will be able to find and read your comment.