Iran
« Court Reform | Back to most recent briefing | Sex Offenders/Education »
Asked about the London meeting on Iran, the PMOS said that this meeting was a signal of the growing international concern at the behaviour of the Iranian Government and also at the words of the Iranian President. That was reflected in the statement of the E3 last week and also in the meeting between President Bush and Chancellor Merkel. Our hope was that the IAEA board would support a referral to the United Nations but we should see what happened. Asked about Iran’s threat to raise oil prices if they were referred to the Security Council, the PMOS said that as Angela Merkel had said in Washington, the international community would not be intimidated by Iran and therefore if that was Iran was trying to they were mistaken.
Asked about the proposed Iranian scientific conference on the Holocaust, the PMOS said that he didn’t think you needed a scientific conference to understand the Holocaust, you just needed to visit Belsen or any of the other similar sites.
Briefing took place at 6:00 | Search for related news
« Court Reform | Back to most recent briefing | Sex Offenders/Education »
Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is
reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's
Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is
reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most
up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original
source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions.
Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright
Downing Street Says.
|
"Asked about Iran’s threat to raise oil prices if they were referred to the Security Council, the PMOS said that as Angela Merkel had said in Washington, the international community would not be intimidated by Iran and therefore if that was Iran was trying to they were mistaken"
I beg to differ. While Iran’s threat to raise oil prices may not bother the money-grabbing liars who keep us in check, it will bother taxpayers who have to fork out yet more because of the rank (and unfortunately deliberate) incompetence of these people. But of course why should the opinion of a few million taxpayers bother the conscience of a government who patently sold out to corporate interests a long time ago?
Comment by PapaLazzzaru — 16 Jan 2006 on 8:08 pm | Link"Asked about the proposed Iranian scientific conference on the Holocaust, the PMOS said that he didn’t think you needed a scientific conference to understand the Holocaust, you just needed to visit Belsen or any of the other similar sites."
One would have thought that by the 21st Century British politicians (ok, I know the PMOS is a Civil Servant, but it’s obvious he/she/all of them went "native" long ago) would have some halfway believable answers to hand, instead of having to pull the raw emotion card. Of course you don’t need a scientific conference to understand the Holocaust; a thorough understanding of the roots of Zionism would help though. And the more digging on this subject one does, the more stupid claims like the one above by the PMOS look. In fact, not only do they look like stupid claims, they look like outright lies; a claim this government and it’s hangers-on is well used to be now.
I urge people to do their own research into the roots of Zionism and it’s connection with the Rothschild family, who have incidentally been the real owners of the Bank of England since the Battle of Waterloo, and even set the world gold price in their London offices until about a year or so ago. That will give you a more realistic take on world events, and why there are so many doubts about "official versions"…
Comment by PapaLazzzaru — 16 Jan 2006 on 8:21 pm | Link