Paul Wolfowitz
« Budget | Back to most recent briefing | House of Commons »
Asked for a reaction to the nomination of Paul Wolfowitz as President of the World Bank, the Prime Minister’s Spokesman (PMS) said that it was for the Bank Board to take the decision on the appointment of the President of the Bank. We were not going to get into a running commentary on the selection process. We should wait and see whether there were any other candidates and wait for the outcome of this process. Obviously we would be involved in consultations with the US and others over this appointment. We would be looking forward to hearing Mr. Wolfowitz’s views on a number off issues which concerned us, such as debt cancellation, free basic education and a number of other issues. Put to her that it was the convention that every other World Bank President had been appointed by the United States without objection, the PMS said she was not denying that but we were in the middle of a process, we should wait and see what happened.
Briefing took place at 11:00 | Search for related news
« Budget | Back to most recent briefing | House of Commons »
Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is
reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's
Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is
reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most
up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original
source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions.
Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright
Downing Street Says.
|
Indeed: we should shut up and wait until the appointment has gone through and it’s too late to do anything about it.
Mind you, it’s hard to see how the World Bank policies could be any worse than they are now, and appointing a man with his record will remove all vestage of credibility. Which may be an improvement.
Comment by Julian Todd — 18 Mar 2005 on 2:21 am | LinkWolfowitz gets his mention.
The Ballad of S.Hussain
in the dim & distant eighties
well before the last hurrah,
the wicked people of Iran
had ditched their saintly Shah.
with forty million fervent
Shia Muslims on the boil
the West preferred the Sunnis
to be managing the oil.
& Rumsfeld came to Baghdad
in nineteen-eighty-three:
"would you think of standing up to
Ayatollah Khomeini;
"this letter from our President
tells all there is to say.
Ronnie & the Pentagon
will back you all the way.
"all the arms & money
that you could ever need,
& patriotic principle,
& where that fails, there\x92s greed."
they cosseted, supplied him
they armed him to the teeth,
lauded & hero-worshipped him;
they stoked his self-belief.
the CIA approved him
a golden boy was Saddam;
they gave him a list of lefties
& straightaway he shot\x92em.
he wanted something nuclear –
"right here! inside the gate?"
(it stayed; UN inspectors found it,
nineteen ninety-eight.)
"we know you don\x92t mean any harm,
– though if perchance you did
be sure we\x92d come & get you
& screw down your little lid.
"you\x92d like to use a chemical?
we wouldn\x92t make a fuss –
this gink is fighting on our side
he\x92s just like one of us!
"what\x92s he doing that\x92s out of place?
we\x92d really like to know –
didn\x92t we use agent orange
not so very long ago?"
they didn\x92t throw their hands up,
they didn\x92t roll their eyes,
they didn\x92t point a finger
at "evil undisguised."
they didn\x92t turn their face away
they never mentioned guilt –
& they didn\x92t just encourage him
they backed him to the hilt.
Kuwait
Iran-Iraq fought eight long years;
about a million died –
the West was very happy
that Saddam was on on its side.
he asked Ambassador Glaspie
how the US ranked Kuwait,
said she "we\x92ve no position there."
thinks he: "well well! why wait?…"
& then they turned against him
for taking them at their word.
(ought one credit diplomats?
now now, don\x92t be absurd.)
they made themselves a demon –
no finer to be had;
& they killed a hundred thousand
in the bombing of Baghdad…
& with Kuwait set "free" once more
the human rights abuses
were twice as monstrous as before
(Amnesty has its uses.)
The Brits: their Ersatz Outrage.
so who first bombed civilians?
it\x92s there in white & black:
not the wicked Germans but
the British in Iraq.
not only rebel towns, but ones
who didn\x92t pay their taxes
they bombed. who were these pioneers?
Britishers, not Nazis;
nothing like a load of bombs
to make the meek feel meeker!
the Germans copied that approach
years later at Gernika…
(turn on the full Churchillian blast –
the greatest Brit inscribes:)
\x93about using poison gas against
uncivilis\xE8d tribes,
\x93I frankly cannot understand,
my dear old Colonel Gossage,
why you should feel so squeamish!\x94 (\x93what?
who? me sir? not a sausage!\x94)
lies for King & Country
\x93it was never about oil –
white man\x92s civilising burden,
missionary toil!
\x93those promises to Arabs,
that guarantee to Kurds?
quoth Hamlet to Polonius
words words words…
\x93some manageable emirates –
partition off Kuwait;
& those bits beside the ocean
no more than six or eight.
\x93let\x92s put a King in Baghdad –
we\x92ve got this Faisal fellow;
his brother\x92s in Trans-Jordan,
we put him there: Abdullah.
\x93they\x92d better vote him in to show
a democratic bent –
say popular approval runs
at ninety-six percent.\x94
that was how they ran things back
in 1933.
something somewhat similar
went on in Germany.
but this was done by our chaps
& New Labour is the heir –
who better to defend it than
the ethical Mr Blair.
Corporate Control of Media
when Atta\x92s magic passport
came floating from the sun –
did they know who they were looking for
before the deed was done?
it\x92s like the magic bullet from
Lee Harvey Oswald\x92s gun
they said caused seven wounds
in one swift blow – not one by one.
it turned up on the trolley
they were wheeling Connally on;
what could have caused this mayhem?
it piped up \x93I\x92m the one!\x94…
the journalists can see all that.
so why no scrutiny?
if they really cared for justice they
would surely mutiny.
but then they get these ukases
& memos from on high.
\x93tell it how we want it or
you lose your job!\x94 – (or die.)
so who owns all the media
since 1996?
four or five conglomerates – or
at the outside six.
even the fabled BBC
in the U.K. (call it Uck):
beautifully modulated
platitudes & muck.
\x93Israelis kill a dozen Pales-
-tinians\x94 – no news.
\x93two settlers die\x94 – another fearsome
outrage against Jews!
what Bush & Blair are saying
now, twists & contradicts
the conclusions just arrived at by
the UN\x92s man, Hans Blix;
& when Blix tells the press-corps
how his words have been distorted,
it simplifies the whole thing if
they leave him unreported.
Powell of My Lai
that little \x91anthrax\x92 phial which
the Secretary showed
\x91could cause\x92 untold destruction…
some explanation\x92s owed.
the one that did the damage
– so the Bureau told the press –
originated in the old
American Mid-West.
the one that did the damage came
from Iowa State at Ames;
so \x91good cop\x92 Colin Powell\x92s playing
very bad cop games.
but what should we expect from one
deputed to deny
that Charlie Company massacred
the children of My Lai.
then it was Major Powell
first took the public eye
& every word he uttered
was a demonstrable lie.
so now he talks of \x91terror,\x92
& a \x91poison factory\x92
& \x91links to Al Qa\x92ida\x92
(which only he can see)
weapons of mass destruction &
an \x91imminent nuclear threat\x92
are we to swallow all he says?
yes sir! right on! you bet!…
the Al Qa\x92ida outfit is
no more than five years old,
so \x91decades of collusion\x92
is imaginative, bold.
Saddam\x92s link to Al Qa\x92ida
had been forcefully denied
by Pentagon, by CIA,
by British MI5.
it \x91foundered,\x92 that relationship,
it sank – no ifs nor buts.
Islamists & Ba\x92athists
– hated each other\x92s guts.
Bin Laden told his followers
\x91according to Islam
it would be quite all right to kill
the infidel Saddam!\x92
(imagine Blair saying \x91Dubya
has to go – & that\x92s official!\x92
hardly the sort of comment that
would keep their friendship special –
though when they talk & Bush suggests
he bow his head to pray, it\x92s
thoughts like that run through his head –
he\x92s too polite to say it…)
there are no nuclear weapons
– the Pentagon knows that –
& he hasn\x92t any rockets
for the nukes he hasn\x92t got.
as for the \x91poison factory\x92 run by
Ansar al Islam
(Kurdish fundamentalists –
enraged against Saddam)
they asked reporters in next day –
empty rooms, bare walls,
no plumbing… & no \x91smoking gun,\x92
no factory at all.
the State Department spokesthing held
that \x91poison factory\x92
would have to stand, since faute de mieux,
\x91I can\x92t retract,\x92 said he,
in a moment of rare insight,
& speaking from the heart:
\x91it\x92s not a description of the fact
but more a term of art!\x92
o holy mother of us all!
so that\x92s what speech is for!
he\x92s hit on a magic formula
to send the world to war.
what a public relations coup!
that takes the golden biscuit.
a casus belli! fight for art!
it\x92s worth a chance! let\x92s risk it!…
a dozen worse dictators,
seven real nuclear powers,
resolutions scouted by
illicit occupiers?
let not a lucid vision mock
investigative toil;
the chessboard has been well described
this war is about oil,
say Rove, Brzezinski, Rumsfeld, Cheney,
Wolfowitz & Feith.
they wrote it – all can read it,
it\x92s not like it was Fate!
& if a half a million
get blown to kingdom come,
the \x91West\x92 will save its living standards,
not like some.
Bush\x92s Last Word to the Children of Iraq
you\x92ve got them hidden somewhere –
doesn\x92t matter what you say,
so it\x92s no good your pretending –
gonna get you anyway!
but we\x92ll bomb with that compassion
that democracy holds dear –
& we wouldn\x92t change our mind
for all the oil in North Korea.
Then & Now
Hans Blix said \x93we need more time.\x94
they couldn\x92t see what for.
\x93our patience is exhausted!\x94 they
let slip the dogs of war.
\x93woof woof woof! bow-wow-wow-wow!
& this will be the news:
weapons of mass destruction – pow!\x94 –
…let conscience not accuse
because now the search is theirs, they haven\x92t
found their sacred cow,
& we hear them call for patience?
\x93that was then & this is now!\x94
\x93disarm\x94 becomes \x93regime-change\x94 –
o it\x92s funny how it skews!
when corporate ethics will allow it
anything is news.
\x93did anything surprise you –
niggling doubts, unspoken fears?\x94
\x93o don\x92t think that,\x94 says Tommy Franks,
\x93this war\x92s been planned for years…\x94
some German crowd did that before –
\x92twas reckoned then a crime;
a lot of them were hanged for it,
the rest of them did time.
that was then & this is now
this ethic we may choose –
Harvard biz-kids take a bow –
& this shall be the news.
this new shower claim exemption,
& they\x92ve largely worked hush-hush;
Wolfowitz & Cheney, Rumsfeld,
Perle & Rove & Bush
enjoy a civil status that
puts them above the law;
they\x92re purer than the angels
when they plot their course for war.
so one law for the Nazis &
another for the Yanks –
though their notions are quite similar,
how best use guns & tanks –
& reams of propaganda about
\x93WMD\x94
& bomb by day & bomb by night
& bomb on live TV.
it\x92s infotainment – crash-bang-pow!
what channel would you choose?
it\x92s worthy of the Chairman Mao.
the masses will enthuse.
the Big Lie beats the Little Lie.
Comment by Sydney Bernard Smith — 20 Mar 2005 on 8:07 am | Link(will paper ink refuse?)
& that was then & this is now –
& this must be the news.
It would be impossible to stock all the unique colors that folks ask for on a regular basis. So instead we now offer a new and unique color every month.
Comment by craps — 29 Jun 2006 on 4:49 pm | Link