» Thursday, January 13, 200524 Hour License Law
Asked if Frank Field was right to forecast a Government rethink on 24 hour drinking, the PMOS said: No. It was important to recognise what the premise was on the position that had been taken. The Government had received representation from the police and others about the problem that a single turning out time was having and it would be better to have flexible closing hours instead to solve this problem. The problem not only needed to be recognised, but also the ability to target problem premises. This was what the law would do. It was also important to note that the number of premises applying for a 24 hour license was very small (about 1-2%). It was to allow for more flexible hours that would make life easier. Asked how the flexible hours would work in practical terms, the PMOS said if there was a problem with local premises, for example, the authorities could take action against them. That was precisely what people wanted; it was not to penalise everyone for the actions of a few, but rather to penalise a few who made life difficult for others. Briefing took place at 15:45 | Search for related news Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions. Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright Downing Street Says. |
The unofficial site which lets you comment on the UK Prime Minister's official briefings. About us...
Search
Supported byRecent Briefings
Archives
LinksSyndicate (RSS/XML)CreditsEnquiriesContact Sam Smith. |
No Comments »
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Post a public comment