Law Lords
« Reshuffle | Back to most recent briefing | Israel »
Asked what the Government’s stance was now that people had had more time to digest the Law Lords decision the PMS said that yesterday’s statement had set out the Government’s position. We would be studying the Law Lords decision carefully to see whether was possible to take into account the concerns they expressed when we bring forward legislation to Parliament. Asked if the statement also took into account the Select Committee on Human Rights recommendation that evidential changes on taping were absolutely essential and if they were in place you would not have to omit them when it went to trial the PMS said that the statement did not refer to those points directly.
Briefing took place at 11:00 | Search for related news
« Reshuffle | Back to most recent briefing | Israel »
Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is
reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's
Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is
reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most
up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original
source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions.
Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright
Downing Street Says.
|
How extraordinary – read this in light of Straw’s erm, interesting comments, reported in the Guardian:
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,12780,1376159,00.html">http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,12780,1376159,00.html</a>
"Notwithstanding the very strident remarks of the law lords – and I respect their rights to make these judgments – the court of appeal, a very senior court in this country, unanimously found in favour of the government when these same issues went before them."
Perhaps the Foreign Secretary has misunderstood the role and purpose of the court hierarchy.
Comment by TL — 17 Dec 2004 on 6:58 pm | Link