» Thursday, June 24, 2004

Cabinet Committees

Asked again about reports that a new Cabinet Committee had been set up to monitor UK-US relations, the Prime Minister’s Official Spokesman (PMOS) said that as he had told journalists this morning, we never commented on Cabinet Committees. Asked if he was suggesting that such a Committee did, in fact, exist, the PMOS said he was simply making the point that we never discussed Cabinet Committees. Put to him that we published an updated list of Committees at fairly regular intervals and that the list in the latest edition of Vacher’s did not record such a Committee, the PMOS referred journalists to the Cabinet Office who, he said, were more knowledgeable about Cabinet Committees than he was. Pressed repeatedly as to whether a Cabinet Committee on UK-US relations had been set up, the PMOS said that he would make the relevant enquiries on journalists’ behalf and they could ask their questions again at tomorrow morning’s briefing.

Briefing took place at 15:45 | Search for related news

5 Comments »

  1. UK-US relation`s,that`s a good one.The U.S.will not let us use Trident.They must not trust us.Why did we spend hundred`s of million`s of pound`s on something we can`t use!!!.

    Comment by george dutton — 4 Sep 2004 on 7:54 pm | Link
  2. Why change the habit of a lifetime?!

    Comment by PapaLazzzaru — 5 Sep 2004 on 4:08 pm | Link
  3. Why would anybody want to *use* these things? It’s a bloody submarine-launched ICBM.

    Inter-Continental Ballistic Missile.

    What the hell do we think we’re going to *do* with a missile, using high-tech "Bravery of Being Out Of Range" American technology to swat a random target on a different continent from the comfort of our own home?

    It’s a MIRV nuclear delivery system. They can keep it. It’s got no bloody use.

    Comment by Gregory Block — 6 Sep 2004 on 10:04 am | Link
  4. I was referring to the cost of it all.Think of the house`s we could have built!.As for buying it in the first place "does it act as a deterrent!".France is the only country in Europe as far as I know that has an independent nuclear deterrent.

    Comment by george dutton — 6 Sep 2004 on 1:20 pm | Link
  5. That just means that the French are the only other idiots, besides the UK, to continue to believe that posession of nuclear arms is a "deterrent", and not "an excuse for others to covertly develop nuclear arms".

    You think recent events would have taught that lesson, but no.

    Comment by Gregory Block — 6 Sep 2004 on 2:36 pm | Link

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Post a public comment

(You must give an email address, but it will not be displayed to the public.)
(You may give your website, and it will be displayed to the public.)

Comments:

This is not a way of contacting the Prime Minister. If you would like to contact the Prime Minister, go to the 10 Downing Street official site.

Privacy note: Shortly after posting, your name and comment will be displayed on the site. This means that people searching for your name on the Internet will be able to find and read your comment.

Downing Street Says...

The unofficial site which lets you comment on the UK Prime Minister's official briefings. About us...

Search


June 2004
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« May   Jul »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

Supported by

mySociety.org

Disruptive Proactivity

Recent Briefings


Archives

Links

Syndicate (RSS/XML)

Credits

Enquiries

Contact Sam Smith.

This site is powered by WordPress. Theme by Jag Singh