Prime Minister’s Visit to Libya
« Parliamentary Security | Back to most recent briefing | Press Office Budget »
Asked to comment on the timing of the Prime Minister’s visit to Libya, the PMOS referred journalists to the extensive briefing on this already from those on the trip. In particular, he would draw journalists’ attention to what the Deputy Prime Minister had said in the House of Commons today and to what Jim Swire had said as well. There were difficult issues, but as the IAEA had verified, the Libyan regime had, in recent months, taken significant steps towards eliminating WMD programs. If a country was making progress with this and withdrawing its support for terrorism, then it was the Prime Minister’s judgement that that country should be helped on the road to rejoining the international community.
Briefing took place at 15:45 | Search for related news
« Parliamentary Security | Back to most recent briefing | Press Office Budget »
Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is
reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's
Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is
reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most
up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original
source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions.
Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright
Downing Street Says.
|
So, we persuaded Gaddafi to give up his WMD (ahaha) so that BAE could sell him lots of new weapons? Well done, ethical foreign policy my arse 🙁
Comment by Matt — 25 Mar 2004 on 2:36 pm | Link"taken significant steps towards eliminating WMD programs." So they arent even reducing existing weapons, just not making new ones as quickly?
Oh fine then, never mind Lockerbie, well done Gadaffi!
Comment by Lodjer — 25 Mar 2004 on 4:09 pm | LinkJaw-jaw is always better than war-war. And as for ‘significant steps’, I think it’s fine to open up in stages as long as it’s seen as an ongoing process – I expect that the rug can be pulled very quickly if Gaddafy decides to stop playing nice.
Comment by Marek Ostrowski — 25 Mar 2004 on 4:38 pm | LinkI expect so, and yes, jaw better than war.
But does this inconsistency not highlight that the reasons behind actions are not the ones we are given?
Iraq was attacked and Saddam deposed because of wmd – which he didn’t have.
And now Gadaffi and Libya are extended diplomatic normalcy (or something close) because of their "steps" regarding wmd.
This is Doublethink. I think.
Comment by Lodjer — 25 Mar 2004 on 4:47 pm | LinkI was very amused by a comment in one of the papers (I can’t be bothered to find it now) on the revelation that we’ll be giving backer of terrorists and pursuer of "weapons of mass destruction" Colonel Gaddafi military aid. "Perhaps," the journalist wrote, "he’s hoping to make it to Brigadier."
Well, I lauged.
Comment by Chris Lightfoot — 25 Mar 2004 on 6:06 pm | LinkHistory used to demand the gradual algorithm of
Terrorist – Freedom Fighter – Statesman
but now the World moves faster
Terrorist – Statesman
a little more acceleration and
TB will be shaking hands with Osama
anyone going to give me odds?
Comment by Roger Huffadine — 25 Mar 2004 on 6:36 pm | LinkTonight, if you listen carefully, you will hear the weapons merchants at BAe clapping along merrily, as Tony Blair dances on the graves of the Lockerbie victims.
Comment by Ron F — 25 Mar 2004 on 6:47 pm | LinkOf course, I may be very much mistaken, but isn’t making and keeping peace a very important factor in the security, physically and politically, of a nation. Should we make enemies by dwelling forever on the hurts a nation has given us, thus clinging desperately to an old enemy, or would it not be far better to make a friend. Now, obviously I do not offer any disrespect to the Lockerbie victims, or their families, but Colonel Gaddafi will soon be dead, for that is the limit of all mankind, but Libya, and Britain’s friendship, with it will last, if we both strive to keep it, for decades.
Benjamin
Comment by benjamin — 25 Mar 2004 on 7:30 pm | Link"taken significant steps towards eliminating WMD programs…."
Isn’t this very vague. I’d really like to know more about the extent to which Libya really had developed the WMD or posed a threat which has now been renounced through the carrot (talks) and stick (example of Iraq). I haven’t picked up much of the detail but what are the precise "steps" that Libya have taken. How much has the threat, now "resolved", been enhanced for political effect?
Having said this it still seems eminently better to lock and engage a country into a wider international community by talking and befriending rather than bombing or forever isolating. More drastic approaches may now have been short circumvented.
Comment by Derek — 25 Mar 2004 on 11:03 pm | Link