» Tuesday, March 23, 2004Middle East
Asked the Prime Minister’s view of events in Israel in the last twenty-four hours, the PMOS said that what had happened was clearly a setback. He was obviously concerned that the situation did not escalate – hence the wide call for restraint. As the Foreign Secretary had underlined yesterday, we condemned the targeted assassination. As Northern Ireland had shown, a political solution was only possible if a violence-free space was created in order to allow dialogue to take place. It went without saying that holding talks against a backdrop of violence on both sides would not enable political progress to be made. Obviously that was not to suggest that these weren’t very difficult issues. Clearly they were. Everyone knew what the prize was. Getting there was obviously a lot harder than wishing those ends. Asked if the Prime Minister thought that President Bush had not focussed as much as he could have done on the Middle East over the past year, the PMOS pointed out that it was the President who had set out the two-state solution and published the roadmap. These were obviously complex, difficult issues. People were continuing to work hard to try to find a way forward. Briefing took place at 15:45 | Search for related news Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions. Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright Downing Street Says. |
The unofficial site which lets you comment on the UK Prime Minister's official briefings. About us...
Search
Supported byRecent Briefings
Archives
LinksSyndicate (RSS/XML)CreditsEnquiriesContact Sam Smith. |
Blair isn’t really leading anyone anywhere with this publicity stunt in the sand. It’s an attempt to get people to imagine that there’s been significant progress in middle eastern politics due to the war in Iraq. What is required is that Blair tell the truth. In effect a full confession as to HIS motives for going into war (geopolitical and personal). Until he does so he is disabled as a leader just when we need one.
Furthermore he needs to tell Bush to get very very serious with the Israeli’s and tell them to evacuate the West Bank and publically call Ariel Sharon a direct threat to British security (through terrorist polarisation along JudeaChristian-Islamic lines) otherwise we will very publically pull out of the coalition citing the moronic and non introspective nature of the Bush/Rumsfeld strategy. This is leadership.
Leadership, in this instance, requires the truth.
Comment by david higgins — 26 Mar 2004 on 8:06 pm | LinkNot bullshit.
Blair’s trip to Libya was bullshit, yet more nonsense from a nonsensical paralysed visionless nonentity awaiting his extirpation from office as soon as the terrorist war hots up.