Constitutional Reforms
« Guantanamo Bay | Back to most recent briefing | Defence Spending »
Asked if the Government had decided what steps to take in the light of Monday’s defeat in the Lords on the Constitutional Reform Bill, the PMOS said that confidential discussions were continuing through the usual channels, as part of the Parliamentary process, about the way forward. What had happened on Monday was unprecedented. The Hare Coursing Bill in 1975 was the last time such a situation had occurred. In answer to further questions as to how the Government might proceed in the light of today’s Times story, the PMOS said that he had seen a number of different scenarios in the press. At this stage we were in discussion mode. Since they had not yet concluded, he was unable to give the clarity journalists wanted.
Briefing took place at 11:00 | Search for related news
« Guantanamo Bay | Back to most recent briefing | Defence Spending »
Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is
reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's
Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is
reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most
up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original
source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions.
Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright
Downing Street Says.
|
As they say in Ireland – if I were trying to get there I wouldn’t start from here!
The electorate will not give a damn whether or not the Lord Chancellor is in position at the election! So this Hare bill would be just a government red herring if we were not also suspicious of Tory motives.
The government should concentrate on the change that is needed: appointment of judges and Lords reform. There is a clear consensus for the judicial appointments so get on with it!
Before radical reform of the House of Lords, we should try more modest reforms that retain the expertise and experience that is the best aspect of the Lords. Only if more modest reforms fail should we go for more radical reform such as majority elected.
The priority must be for government to look at the range of options for a democratic appointments panel.
Comment by Mike Haseler — 10 Mar 2004 on 5:00 pm | Link