» Tuesday, March 16, 2004

Electoral Reform

Asked if the Cabinet was backing a Proportional Representation system for elections in the light of Peter Hain’s comments, the PMOS said not as far as he knew. From memory he thought there was a commitment to have a look at some of the issues, but only after the forthcoming elections this year. Cabinet had not discussed it recently though.

Briefing took place at 15:45 | Search for related news

11 Comments »

  1. Hain is advocating the "alternative vote" system:
    <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/uk_politics/3517900.stm">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/uk_politics/3517900.stm</a&gt;

    This is a system which takes account of voter preferences in individual constituencies; it isn’t based on a list. Details here:
    <a href="http://www.aceproject.org/main/english/es/esd03.htm">http://www.aceproject.org/main/english/es/esd03.htm</a&gt;

    Comment by Chris Lightfoot — 17 Mar 2004 on 12:38 pm | Link
  2. Didn’t Labour commit to PR before it came to power?

    Some of the advantages of AV look quite interesting, particularly the possibility of increased influence of smaller parties as the larger ones "bid" for second preferences.

    Is it possible to trust a ruling government to make changes to the electoral system in an honest way?

    Comment by Lodjer — 17 Mar 2004 on 12:58 pm | Link
  3. Labour did not commit to PR before 1997. There was a commitment to look into the subject which produced the Jenkins report, but as this was a pile of rubbish it went no further. The 2001 manifesto did not commit to any further action.

    Comment by David Boothroyd — 17 Mar 2004 on 1:23 pm | Link
  4. For information, the Jenkins Commission recommended AV-plus, which is summarised here:
    <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/rn/1998-99/99rn14.htm">http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/rn/1998-99/99rn14.htm</a&gt;

    I’d be interested to know what makes it "a pile of rubbish" — I haven’t read the Commission’s full report, but the bits I have read seem sensible enough.

    Comment by Chris Lightfoot — 17 Mar 2004 on 2:09 pm | Link
  5. Funny how Labour starts nervously toying with the idea of electoral reform once a rumour of the Conservatives considering dropping Scottish Westminster MPs starts doing the rounds.

    Comment by Tim — 17 Mar 2004 on 4:28 pm | Link
  6. I’d also be interested to know what bearing events in Spain over the past week or so have had on government thinking. I wouldn’t mind betting there is a huge amount of research going on in government departments right now, looking at ways of maximizing votes in a reformed voting system in case a repeat of the Spanish general election happens over here. I also wouldn’t mind betting that this sudden talk of electoral reform has come about because the government has suddenly had a huge shock and realise that they need to do something to win back voters. I think it is far too little and far far too late; I only hope the electorate of this country show the same courage and conviction as the Spanish.

    Comment by PapaLazzzaru — 17 Mar 2004 on 4:39 pm | Link
  7. AV is not a proportional system, in fact in some cases it can be less proportional than FPTP.

    You have to have multi-member constituencies to have a PR System. The best system, as proposed by the Electoral Reform Society is STV, on 4 member constituencies.

    Comment by Andrew — 18 Mar 2004 on 3:32 pm | Link
  8. The problem with P.R.in Britain at the moment is that Britain is a very divided society and P.R. may divided it even more!.I wonder how long the Tories would put up with being the single biggest partie and have to play second fiddle to a Labour/Lib Dem goverment or a Lib Dem/Labour goverment.I can`t see them making pact`s with far left partie`s.

    Comment by george dutton — 5 Aug 2004 on 12:50 am | Link
  9. I no all politicians lie but what this goverment
    well its time to call time there performents over the last few weeks on eduction failed
    prisons free in this country failed
    NHS trust a joke failed yes failed on the very basics of goverment when are they going to take note of what we yes we the people of this country are saying I say to the labour goverment
    enough is a enough Q; If there is any one out there needs the solution to most of the problms
    then i have them .

    Comment by Alan Sutton — 22 May 2006 on 11:13 pm | Link
  10. I have to agree with Andrew that STV (also called Choice Voting) is the best voting system. Choice Voting provides fair representation for all points of view while preserving majority rule. Choice Voting also gives voters genuine choice and virtually eliminates probems such as tactical voting and wasted votes.

    Choice Voting will be used for the Local Elections in Scotland next month. Choice Voting is used for Local, European and Assembly Elections in Northen Ireland.

    Comment by John Cross — 1 Apr 2007 on 12:47 pm | Link
  11. I have to agree with Andrew that STV (also called Choice Voting) is the best voting system. Choice Voting provides fair representation for all points of view while preserving majority rule. Choice Voting also gives voters genuine choice and virtually eliminates probems such as tactical voting and wasted votes.

    Choice Voting will be used for the Local Elections in Scotland next month. Choice Voting is used for Local, European and Assembly Elections in Northen Ireland.

    Comment by John Cross — 1 Apr 2007 on 12:48 pm | Link

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Post a public comment

(You must give an email address, but it will not be displayed to the public.)
(You may give your website, and it will be displayed to the public.)

Comments:

This is not a way of contacting the Prime Minister. If you would like to contact the Prime Minister, go to the 10 Downing Street official site.

Privacy note: Shortly after posting, your name and comment will be displayed on the site. This means that people searching for your name on the Internet will be able to find and read your comment.

Downing Street Says...

The unofficial site which lets you comment on the UK Prime Minister's official briefings. About us...

Search


March 2004
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Feb   Apr »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Supported by

mySociety.org

Disruptive Proactivity

Recent Briefings


Archives

Links

Syndicate (RSS/XML)

Credits

Enquiries

Contact Sam Smith.

This site is powered by WordPress. Theme by Jag Singh