Constitutional Reforms
« Northern Ireland | Back to most recent briefing | Peter Foster »
Asked if, in the light of Peter Hain’s differing comments yesterday and today, the Government fully intended to invoke the Parliament Act to force the Constitutional Reform Bill through Parliament or whether it merely might do so, the PMOS said that the Government was committed to getting its legislation on the statute book for reasons that were well known. In our view, the amendment, as framed, amounted to a delaying tactic and a device to kick the proposals into the long grass. A vote was due to take place in the Lords this evening. We would have to await the result before deciding how to take things forward. Peter Hain had simply been underlining the Government’s determination yesterday to get the Bill through. Asked if Mr Hain had been told not to repeat the threat he had made yesterday, hence the toned down version today, the PMOS said that we were taking things one step at a time.
Briefing took place at 15:45 | Search for related news
« Northern Ireland | Back to most recent briefing | Peter Foster »
Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is
reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's
Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is
reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most
up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original
source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions.
Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright
Downing Street Says.
|
I remember when Peter Hain had integrity – he has now advanced to the stage in his career wher such virtues would inhibit his salary earning potential.
Comment by Roger Huffadine — 9 Mar 2004 on 1:38 pm | LinkYeh – use the Parliment Act to shove something else that we don’t want or need down our throats.
Has this government lost sight of the principles of democracy and honour?
In a word (or 4); a long time ago…
Comment by PapaLazzzaru — 9 Mar 2004 on 1:40 pm | Link