Iraq
« Gas Supply | Back to most recent briefing | Respect Action Plan »
Asked about General Rose’s comments on the Today programme that the Prime Minister should be impeached, the PMOS said that General Rose was entitled to his view. Equally the Government was perfectly entitled to point out that there had been three democratic elections in Iraq last year for the first time in well over a generation.
In the last of those 70% of the population of Iraq had expressed their view, which was considerable progress from what had gone on before. In terms of the reasons why we had gone to war they had been investigated by four inquiries including two select committees of Parliament. So the matter had been well scrutinised. In terms of the outcome, we were seeing the formation of a democratically elected government, despite the ongoing difficulties, and that spoke for itself. Asked whether it was normal for Generals to suggest impeachment, the PMOS said that General Rose had been retired for quite some time now.
Briefing took place at 9:00 | Search for related news
« Gas Supply | Back to most recent briefing | Respect Action Plan »
Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is
reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's
Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is
reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most
up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original
source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions.
Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright
Downing Street Says.
|
So, it’s the opinion of the PMOS that General Rose is a nutty old fruitcake, no longer serving in the armed forces, past retirement age and therefore to be ignored. I suspect that Rose knows far more about this than he’s yet revealed.
Blair’s stated purpose of the war was to eliminate the threat of WMD, not to arrange three Iraqui ‘democratic’ elections.
The four dubious ‘enquiries’ were into matters which were at the periphery.
This is the usual half-truth and mud-slinging which the PMOS is attempting to turn into his own particular art form.
Comment by Chuck Unsworth — 9 Jan 2006 on 3:09 pm | LinkIf this is the PMOS admitting that we entered Iraq to complete a "regime change", as it appears to be, then the war was illegal and Tony should be prosecuted.
Comment by Roger Huffadine — 9 Jan 2006 on 7:30 pm | LinkWhen the PMOS is supporting General Rose like this I’m very happy 😉