Downing Street Says

Asked if the Prime Minister was planning to vote on the ID Cards Bill later today, the PMOS replied that the Prime Minister would make that decision himself at the time.

Put to the PMOS that the technology did not work, people seemed to be swinging against ID cards, costs were an issue, civil liberty arguments were being raised, and that people had admitted they would not have stopped the London bombings, what was left and how were they being justified, the PMOS replied that if he went through the sweeping generalisation contained in each of the questions, he would be there for the rest of the day! Instead, he said he would address the positives, rather than the negatives. The PMOS said that ID cards would help disrupt the use of false and multiple identities by organised criminals and those involved in terrorist activities, they would help to tackle illegal working and immigration abuse, whilst also enabling easier, more convenient access to services, and ensured that free public services were only available to those entitled to them. ID cards would also help protect people from identity fraud and theft, and they ensured that British citizens were able to continue to travel freely as international requirements for secure biometric identity documents developed. The PMOS also said that the technology was developing all the time, and where we were today was not where we were going to be at the point where ID cards came into being. We were looking at how other departments could use ID cards to help in their work, so there was an expanding market for their use.

Put to the PMOS that terrorism was not on the list, the PMOS replied that it was, as identity cards would help disrupt the use of false and multiple identities by organised criminals and those involved in terrorist activities, as he had said.

Asked who on the access to services argument was going to question the fact that someone might not have an ID card, and therefore was not eligible to be treated, the PMOS said it depended on how departments used the cards, and those discussions would continue. What was important was that departments were able to insist on a high level of identity proof, for instance in the NHS.

Asked if that meant doctors, the PMOS said people should wait to see how departments thought through the process.

Asked if the Government was therefore asking people to vote on technology that did not exist, the PMOS replied that the technology was in development, and that was the important thing to remember. What people should not do was base decisions on past technology, because technology developed very quickly.

Asked if it was the case that one of the extra safeguards that Charles Clarke was going to announce today was people would be able to look at their own entry on the ID database to see who else had accessed their identity, the PMOS said he was not aware of that particular safeguard, but the amendments were being put down today. The PMOS explained that anyone involved in manufacturing the card must keep the information confidential and breaking that would be punishable by up to two years in jail. The second amendment said that no numbers could be included on the database if their existence led to the disclosure of sensitive information, for example, the presence of a medical condition.

6 Comments »

My wife and I, like many others, have received incorrect European Health Insurance Cards, we obtained corrected cards but did not have to surrender the original ones, had I not destroyed the first set we could now be in possession of two ‘spare’ cards. So much protecting the public, the idiots are making matters worse.
Comment by Colonel Mad — 18 Oct 2005 on 11:40 pm | Link
My wife and I, like many others, have received incorrect European Health Insurance Cards, we obtained corrected cards but did not have to surrender the original ones, had I not destroyed the first set we could now be in possession of two ‘spare’ cards. So much protecting the public, the idiots are making matters worse.
Comment by Colonel Mad — 18 Oct 2005 on 11:41 pm | Link
That, of course is all four of us.
Comment by Colonel Mad — 19 Oct 2005 on 10:53 pm | Link
That, of course is all four of us.
Comment by Colonel Mad — 19 Oct 2005 on 10:54 pm | Link
That, of course is all four of us.
Comment by Colonel Mad — 19 Oct 2005 on 10:54 pm | Link
Ah, now sixteen. Oh my society, do we have a problem with the security loop
Comment by Colonel Mad — 19 Oct 2005 on 10:56 pm | Link

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Post a public comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required)
(You must give an email address, but it will not be displayed to the public.)
Website
(You may give your website, and it will be displayed to the public.)

Comments:

This is not a way of contacting the Prime Minister. If you would like to contact the Prime Minister, go to the 10 Downing Street official site.

Privacy note: Shortly after posting, your name and comment will be displayed on the site. This means that people searching for your name on the Internet will be able to find and read your comment.

Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions. Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright Downing Street Says.

» Tuesday, October 18, 2005

ID cards

6 Comments »

Post a public comment

Search

Supported by

Recent Briefings

Archives

Links

Syndicate (RSS/XML)

Credits

Enquiries