Security at Labour Party Conference
« IRA decommissioning | Back to most recent briefing | Russia »
Asked whether there would be a security review carried out in light of the response to the incident where a minister was speaking was interrupted by someone in the audience, the PMOS replied it was a matter for the Labour Party.
Briefing took place at 15:00 | Search for related news
« IRA decommissioning | Back to most recent briefing | Russia »
Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is
reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's
Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is
reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most
up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original
source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions.
Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright
Downing Street Says.
|
I knew that Tony no longer represented the Labour Party as he is only interested in himself – but – I didn’t know that he had both resigned and abdicated the responsibilities of his post.
Comment by Roger Huffadine — 4 Oct 2005 on 5:37 pm | LinkWell, the bit where the Labour Party’s hired goons dragged the chap out of the hall isn’t a matter for the government — no doubt the local Police can recognise assault when they see it and the local magistrates won’t allow the privileged position of Labour Party servants to get in the way of the administration of justice to the guilty parties.
The bit where the local Police used the Terrorism Act for politically-inspired harrassment of the victim is a bit less clear. Passing a new Terrorism Act every ten minutes in an attempt to make it look as if they’re doing something about terrorism has been a hallmark of this government, and ultimately they should take responsibility for the consequences.
I hope the Labour Party pay for the cost of policing their conference.
Comment by Chris Lightfoot — 7 Oct 2005 on 3:37 pm | LinkYeah right! Much more likely and just that the taxpayer (who didn’t even want this government) should foot the bill…
Comment by PapaLazzzaru — 7 Oct 2005 on 3:46 pm | Link