David Blunkett’s House
« Northern Ireland | Back to most recent briefing | Court Martial »
Asked if David Blunkett would be staying in his house indefinitely, due to security reasons, the PMOS said "indefinitely" was a very big word. It was no unusual in the past for a transition period to occur in similar cases. The situation had not changed since the last time he was asked the same question last week. As for timescales, given there were security issues, the PMOS said he would not go into any further details.
Put to him the Leader of the House seemed to think the situation regarding Mr. Blunkett’s house was a permanent one, the PMOS repeated not only was he not going to talk about security matters, but also that transition periods in the past had not been instant either.
Asked if this therefore meant there would be different security considerations for the new Home Secretary, the PMOS said different Home Secretary’s had different security arrangements.
Briefing took place at 15:45 | Search for related news
« Northern Ireland | Back to most recent briefing | Court Martial »
Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is
reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's
Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is
reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most
up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original
source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions.
Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright
Downing Street Says.
|
Silly me – I thought that security could be provided at almost any location.
What is it about the present house that is ‘special’?
Comment by Roger Huffadine — 22 Jan 2005 on 11:25 am | Linkand why is that special characteristic essential to David B?
David Blunkett is reponsible for the outrages caused to my family. http://homepage.ntlworld.com/c.rover
Comment by bill webber — 7 Oct 2005 on 4:17 pm | Link