George Galloway
« David Blunkett | Back to most recent briefing | Jonathan Baume/Civil Servants »
Asked if the Prime Minister was pleased to see George Galloway vindicated in court earlier, the PMOS said that he did not get involved in court cases.
Briefing took place at 11:00 | Search for related news
« David Blunkett | Back to most recent briefing | Jonathan Baume/Civil Servants »
Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is
reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's
Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is
reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most
up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original
source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions.
Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright
Downing Street Says.
|
Very wise.
But the previous news item notes the call to avoid a "rush to judgement" on the issues concerning David Blunkett.
In retrospect did not the confused nature of events in Iraq and the dynamics of the media create strong pressures for a rush to judgement about George Galloway?
This is not a question for the government alone or for the media alone.
In the case of George Galloway, while he may not always have been his own best lobbyist is it not possible that the way his case was handled in the Labour Party was influenced by the prejudices created by a rush to judgement, that the recent verdict has now established definitely occurred?
Chris Burford
Comment by Chris Burford — 5 Dec 2004 on 5:33 pm | Link