» Thursday, January 20, 2005
David Blunkett’s House
Asked if David Blunkett would be staying in his house indefinitely, due to security reasons, the PMOS said "indefinitely" was a very big word. It was no unusual in the past for a transition period to occur in similar cases. The situation had not changed since the last time he was asked the same question last week. As for timescales, given there were security issues, the PMOS said he would not go into any further details.
Put to him the Leader of the House seemed to think the situation regarding Mr. Blunkett’s house was a permanent one, the PMOS repeated not only was he not going to talk about security matters, but also that transition periods in the past had not been instant either.
Asked if this therefore meant there would be different security considerations for the new Home Secretary, the PMOS said different Home Secretary’s had different security arrangements.
Briefing took place at 15:45 | Search for related news
Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions. Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright Downing Street Says.
Search
| Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Dec | Feb » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| 31 | ||||||
Supported by
Recent Briefings
- Leak inquiry
- Euro
- Mortgage figures
- Credit Card Meeting
- EU Finanical Package
- Economy
- Car Companies
- Misc
- New Zealand PM
- Economy
Archives
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 1970
Links
Syndicate (RSS/XML)
Credits
Enquiries
Contact Sam Smith.
Silly me - I thought that security could be provided at almost any location.
What is it about the present house that is ’special’?
Comment by Roger Huffadine — 22 Jan 2005 on 11:25 am | Linkand why is that special characteristic essential to David B?
David Blunkett is reponsible for the outrages caused to my family. http://homepage.ntlworld.com/c.rover
Comment by bill webber — 7 Oct 2005 on 4:17 pm | Link