BBC Licence Fees
« MMR | Back to most recent briefing | Guantanamo Bay »
Asked if the Prime Minister was still committed to Licence Fees as a way of funding the BBC, the PMOS referred journalists to what Tessa Jowell had said previously. She had said that it would be improbable if not impossible to find an alternative. That remained the position. These were matters which were considered as part of the Charter Review, as they were with every Charter Review, so that was nothing new.
Briefing took place at 11:00 | Search for related news
« MMR | Back to most recent briefing | Guantanamo Bay »
Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is
reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's
Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is
reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most
up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original
source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions.
Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright
Downing Street Says.
|
Dare I link to Tom’s opinions on this?
Comment by Chris Lightfoot — 1 Mar 2004 on 3:14 am | Linkhttp://radish.hosted.doosh.net/steiny/mt/archives/000022.html
Invert the model – it might be crazy, but how crazy?
Comment by Gavin Starks — 5 Mar 2004 on 5:57 pm | Linkhttp://www.dgen.net/2004/02/29/bbc_charter.htm
You suggest an optional subscription to BBC online in place of the licence fee, with broadcasts being paid for out of subscriptions to BBC online. Surely this puts a "capitalist-agenda" at the core of BBC online and creates an unchecked incentive to reduce the cost of providing broadcast material with an inevitable reduction in quality.
What makes the BBC worthwhile is the fact that it caters to a wider cross-section of the public than a profit driven broadcaster, who will attempt to maximise the audience of each individual program resulting in "popular" broadcasts of limited variety.
The BBC needs some market forces to ensure that viewers are getting value for money, but any optional fee will reduce it to the level of other broadcasters. What is needed is a funding structure that rewards the BBC according to the percentage of the population reached over the course of a week’s broadcasting.
Comment by Paul Warren — 5 Mar 2004 on 11:47 pm | Link