<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BBC Licence Fees</title>
	<link>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2004/02/24/156</link>
	<description>Every day the Prime Minister's Spokesman meets a small coterie of political journalists known as 'the lobby' for a topical chat, or 'briefing'.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Warren</title>
		<link>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2004/02/24/156#comment-283</link>
		<author>Paul Warren</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2004 23:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2004/02/24/156#comment-283</guid>
		<description>You suggest an optional subscription to BBC online in place of the licence fee, with broadcasts being paid for out of subscriptions to BBC online.  Surely this puts a &#34;capitalist-agenda&#34; at the core of BBC online and creates an unchecked incentive to reduce the cost of providing broadcast material with an inevitable reduction in quality.

What makes the BBC worthwhile is the fact that it caters to a wider cross-section of the public than a profit driven broadcaster, who will attempt to maximise the audience of each individual program resulting in &#34;popular&#34; broadcasts of limited variety.

The BBC needs some market forces to ensure that viewers are getting value for money, but any optional fee will reduce it to the level of other broadcasters.  What is needed is a funding structure that rewards the BBC according to the percentage of the population reached over the course of a week's broadcasting.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You suggest an optional subscription to BBC online in place of the licence fee, with broadcasts being paid for out of subscriptions to BBC online.  Surely this puts a &quot;capitalist-agenda&quot; at the core of BBC online and creates an unchecked incentive to reduce the cost of providing broadcast material with an inevitable reduction in quality.</p>
<p>What makes the BBC worthwhile is the fact that it caters to a wider cross-section of the public than a profit driven broadcaster, who will attempt to maximise the audience of each individual program resulting in &quot;popular&quot; broadcasts of limited variety.</p>
<p>The BBC needs some market forces to ensure that viewers are getting value for money, but any optional fee will reduce it to the level of other broadcasters.  What is needed is a funding structure that rewards the BBC according to the percentage of the population reached over the course of a week&#8217;s broadcasting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Starks</title>
		<link>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2004/02/24/156#comment-282</link>
		<author>Gavin Starks</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2004 17:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2004/02/24/156#comment-282</guid>
		<description>Invert the model - it might be crazy, but how crazy?
http://www.dgen.net/2004/02/29/bbc_charter.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Invert the model - it might be crazy, but how crazy?<br />
<a href="http://www.dgen.net/2004/02/29/bbc_charter.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.dgen.net/2004/02/29/bbc_charter.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lightfoot</title>
		<link>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2004/02/24/156#comment-60</link>
		<author>Chris Lightfoot</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2004 03:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2004/02/24/156#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Dare I link to Tom's opinions on this?
http://radish.hosted.doosh.net/steiny/mt/archives/000022.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dare I link to Tom&#8217;s opinions on this?<br />
<a href="http://radish.hosted.doosh.net/steiny/mt/archives/000022.html" rel="nofollow">http://radish.hosted.doosh.net/steiny/mt/archives/000022.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
