Succession/Spectator
« Dr. Condoleezza Rice visit | Back to most recent briefing | Prime Minister’s speeches/Iraq »
Put that the Spectator had reported that before the Prime Minister went on his trip, he and the Chancellor had met to discuss the succession, and it claimed they had agreed dates, that they had discussed the process of how the transfer might take place, and was this true, the PMOS asked which detailed source did the Spectator quote for this?
The journalist replied that it was an un-named source, as the PMOS would not be surprised to learn. The PMOS replied that he would not dignify it with a comment.
Asked if it could be inferred from that that it was a non-denial denial, the PMOS replied that he had nothing that in any way suggested that any of it was true, but also, that he would not contribute to the Spectator publicity machine.
Asked if the PMOS was saying that he did not know, i.e. that it might be true, but he did not know if it was, the PMOS replied: no, what he was saying was that it was not worthy of comment. Whenever the Spectator produced some evidence of this, then perhaps it would be worthy of comment, but they had produced absolutely none.
Briefing took place at 6:00 | Search for related news
« Dr. Condoleezza Rice visit | Back to most recent briefing | Prime Minister’s speeches/Iraq »
Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is
reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's
Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is
reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most
up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original
source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions.
Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright
Downing Street Says.
|
No Comments »
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Post a public comment