PMQs
« 2012 Olympics | Back to most recent briefing | Richard Gillingwater »
Asked by the BBC if given that the Prime Minister was taking PMQs despite the absence of the leader of the opposition David Cameron it was a sign that the Prime Minister did not trust any other member of his Cabinet to answer questions from William Hague, the PMOS asked the journalist to spell out what PMQs stood for. It was Prime Minister’s Questions, not Leader of the Opposition’s Questions. If the Prime Minister was in the country he took PMQs. If he happened to be abroad, as it happened the leader of the opposition could still do it, though they tended not to. So while he would congratulate David Cameron on his happy circumstances, the Prime Minister would still hold Prime Minister’s Questions thank you very much.
Briefing took place at 17:00 | Search for related news
« 2012 Olympics | Back to most recent briefing | Richard Gillingwater »
Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is
reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's
Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is
reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most
up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original
source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions.
Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright
Downing Street Says.
|
Why it called Prime Ministers Questions,when the government don’t give answers? And why are they allowed to get away with it? Is the Speaker in cohoots with Tony Blair?
Comment by Della Petch — 16 Feb 2006 on 5:47 pm | LinkA bit touchy aren’t we PMOS? Was this after a large lunch maybe? Or is the job getting to you perhaps?
You probably could do with a lie-down in a darkened room for a while. Ten years seems like an appropriate length of time.
Comment by Chuck Unsworth — 16 Feb 2006 on 7:26 pm | LinkHe could try answering the West Lothian Question … oh wait a minute, he did – he said tough, the Scots will still be ruling England.
Comment by Stuart Parr — 16 Feb 2006 on 8:48 pm | Link