Aircraft
« Energy-nuclear | Back to most recent briefing | Terrorism Bill-ACPO »
Asked if the Prime Minister would like a Government aircraft at his disposal, the PMOS replied that the simple fact was, as we had tried to tell people, that we had not yet received Sir Peter Gershon’s report, though other departments had. Therefore, it would better to wait and see what the report said. The facts were very simple: the present arrangements involved aircraft that were increasingly old and unreliable. Therefore, we had to do something about it, but it would be better to wait for Sir Peter Gershon’s report.
Asked whether it would be convenient for the Prime Minister to use, the PMOS said again it would be better that people waited for the report to come out.
Briefing took place at 13:00 | Search for related news
« Energy-nuclear | Back to most recent briefing | Terrorism Bill-ACPO »
Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is
reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's
Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is
reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most
up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original
source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions.
Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright
Downing Street Says.
|
"Therefore, it would better to wait and see what the report said."
What, we have to wait for some report before the PMOS can offer an opinion about the PM’s thoughts on having his own toy plane? Why? Won’t he think about it until then?
"the present arrangements involved aircraft that were increasingly old and unreliable."
…although they’re fine for the rest of us, apparently.
Comment by PapaLazzzaru — 22 Nov 2005 on 2:55 am | LinkNow this will be a good one.
Gordon has to approve a budget for a plane that Tony will use for a short while but which is really for Gordon.
Anyone taking odds on this one?
Comment by Roger Huffadine — 22 Nov 2005 on 12:35 pm | Link