» Friday, November 18, 2005

Education Speech

Asked what the Prime Minister hoped to achieve today and what his message was to members of his party who still remained unconvinced, the Prime Minister’s Official Spokesman (PMOS) said that what the Prime Minister had set out to achieve today was first of all to recognise the improvements there had been in the education system in the last few years. He had set those out in detail in the speech. Secondly, he had wanted to recognise two things. One that even with those improvements there were still many children who left school without 5 good GCSEs and that there were still too many children in deprived areas that were not getting as good an education as they should. Two, in the globalised world that we lived in we needed to raise the skill and educational base of this country.

This was why, as he said himself, he was restless not just to keep the improvements that there had been on track but to take the educational achievement to a different level for this country. This was not just for the good schools but for every single pupil. Those not yet convinced should look at the White Paper in detail and deal with the reality of what the White Paper said and not the myths that people had heard about it. The reality for instance on admissions was that there was no change in policy. If anything there was a strengthening of the adjudicator’s powers in the sense that the adjudicators ruling would now last for three years rather than one.

Put to him that some labour MPs were saying that the admissions policy should stay with the local authorities as such, and was there any possibility that before this legislation was published that would be incorporated, the PMOS said that the person who ruled on admissions policy was the schools adjudicator. That was the system we had at the minute. That ruling only lasted for one year, under the White Paper it would last for three years. New schools could not change their admissions policy for three years. So the safeguards were well and truly there. Asked then if there would be no change from the White Paper to the legislation on this crucial issue, the PMOS said the proposals were there and the whole purpose of the parliamentary process was to have a debate, but we should have that debate on what the White Paper actually said.

Put to him that the White Paper said that admissions policy would be given to the schools, but MPs were saying it should stay with the local authority, the PMOS said that the person that oversaw how schools operated their admissions policy on a set system would still be the school’s adjudicator, as at the moment. The schools adjudicator power would be strengthened not weakened.

Briefing took place at 8:00 | Search for related news

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Post a public comment

(You must give an email address, but it will not be displayed to the public.)
(You may give your website, and it will be displayed to the public.)

Comments:

This is not a way of contacting the Prime Minister. If you would like to contact the Prime Minister, go to the 10 Downing Street official site.

Privacy note: Shortly after posting, your name and comment will be displayed on the site. This means that people searching for your name on the Internet will be able to find and read your comment.

Downing Street Says...

The unofficial site which lets you comment on the UK Prime Minister's official briefings. About us...

Search


November 2005
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Oct   Dec »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

Supported by

mySociety.org

Disruptive Proactivity

Recent Briefings


Archives

Links

Syndicate (RSS/XML)

Credits

Enquiries

Contact Sam Smith.

This site is powered by WordPress. Theme by Jag Singh