Downing Street Says » EU-Common Agricultural Policy

Asked if the Government still believed, as it had stated after the CAP deal, that there had been significant progress on the issue of CAP reform, the Prime Minister’s Official Spokesman (PMOS) said that before 2002 CAP had absorbed something like 70% of the EU budget, it now absorbed 40% of the EU budget, so there had been progress. The Prime Minister said in the House on the 20 October 2002 that the important thing was that as a result of that outcome, enlargement remained on-track and fundamental CAP reform remained on the agenda. He hadn’t said that fundamental CAP reform had been achieved, he had said it remained on the agenda. The important thing was that we had kept it on the agenda and we continued to keep it on the agenda. We didn’t do that for dogmatic reasons, we do it because we believed that the current budget didn’t address the needs of Europe in the 21st Century and therefore it needed to be adapted to do so. Asked if the Government still believed that France had made a dramatic shift on the issue, the PMOS said that that a drop of around 30% in the proportion of money spent on CAP was dramatic. In saying that it wasn’t the completion of the process of reform. It was matter of getting what progress you could, when you could get it in an organisation which worked on a consensus, as the EU did. Anyone could stand on the sidelines and say all sorts of things, but you could only achieve progress in the EU through consensus. Asked what sort of figure we would be looking to end up at, the PMOS said that as he had said this morning, you started from an assessment of the needs of the EU and then you moved forward from that assessment. The important thing was that you didn’t have an artificial figure, but a figure based on an assessment and comparison between different needs. Asked when he expected progress to be made, the PMOS said that these sorts of negotiations tended to take on a life of their own and he was sure this would be no exception. He would not give a running commentary.

Asked what the Prime Minister’s ambitions were for enlisting the new EU member states for his reform agenda, the PMOS said that in terms of the accession states, what was more important was where they started from. They shared a similar view to us on issues such as services and liberalisation of the market. We did not make the case for the rebate in terms of dogma, we made it in terms of fairness. How that worked out was a matter for others and for discussion. He was not going to get into the detail of where various people were or whatever proposals were being made. It was better that we waited for the discussions to take place. The rebate was there because of the distortion of the budget; that was the starting point.

Asked if the Prime Minister was neglecting the domestic agenda, specifically in terms of ASBOs, the PMOS said that he knew the Prime Minister could not go abroad without the Daily Express suggesting that somehow or other the Prime Minister was cut off from the good people of the United Kingdom. The PMOS assured journalists that the Red Boxes also travelled with the Prime Minister and what they contained was very much about the domestic agenda, even when he was abroad. In terms of the specific point, whilst there had been no specific meeting on ASBOs there had been lots of discussion and there would be a meeting in the next few weeks. ASBOS were never far from the Prime Minister’s mind.

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Post a public comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required)
(You must give an email address, but it will not be displayed to the public.)
Website
(You may give your website, and it will be displayed to the public.)

Comments:

This is not a way of contacting the Prime Minister. If you would like to contact the Prime Minister, go to the 10 Downing Street official site.

Privacy note: Shortly after posting, your name and comment will be displayed on the site. This means that people searching for your name on the Internet will be able to find and read your comment.

Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions. Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright Downing Street Says.

» Wednesday, June 15, 2005

EU-Common Agricultural Policy

No Comments »

Post a public comment

Search

Supported by

Recent Briefings

Archives

Links

Syndicate (RSS/XML)

Credits

Enquiries