ID Cards
« Afghan Troops | Back to most recent briefing | EU Rebate »
Asked to comment on an ICM survey that suggested that ID cards were less popular than the Government had claimed, the PMS said she had not seen the survey, and could not therefore comment. The PMS said the Government had set out its plans when it recently published the Bill.
Briefing took place at 15:45 | Search for related news
« Afghan Troops | Back to most recent briefing | EU Rebate »
Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is
reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's
Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is
reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most
up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original
source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions.
Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright
Downing Street Says.
|
For information, here is an extract from the No2ID press release about the poll:
"Campaign group NO2ID (1) today released the results of an ICM poll of 1,000 people (2) commissioned last week, which indicates a significant drop in public support for ID cards to just 55% from the Government’s claimed 80%. The survey shows that 43% of the population now think that ID cards are a bad or very bad idea."
Full text:
Comment by Chris Lightfoot — 13 Jun 2005 on 7:01 pm | Link<a href="http://www.no2id.net/news/pressRelease/release.php?name=Public%20support%20for%20ID%20cards%20collapses">http://www.no2id.net/news/pressRelease/release.php?name=Public%20support%20for%20ID%20cards%20collapses</a>
Tell the public it costs \xA385 each and they’ll hate ID cards. Tell them only ‘bad’ people will suffer, that it will make their own life more secure, safe and simple, that it’ll catch (all)welfare cheats, stop crime (entirely) and banish illegal immigration (at a stroke) and they’ll love it.
The important statistic is that only 22% of the electorate voted for this government.
Comment by Mr Pooter — 14 Jun 2005 on 9:09 am | LinkSilicon.com a web based daily newsletter for the IT and Comms industries has, uncharacteristically, started a lobbying campaign asking the government to substantiate the case for ID cards
<a href="http://www.silicon.com/research/specialreports/idcards/">http://www.silicon.com/research/specialreports/idcards/</a>
Comment by Roger Huffadine — 15 Jun 2005 on 9:45 am | LinkThere’s no evidence to support the notion that ID Cards help to reduce crime or the possibility of terrorist attacks. Which nation has shown or proved this to be the case?
If this moneymaking wheeze is (sponsored by) and given to the likes of EDS we can expect the cost to quadruple, the implementation timescale to triple and the actual effectiveness to be about half of that predicted. There will be numerous ‘teething problems’ costing millions of pounds and, all the while, Ministers will be trotting out the old garbage about how much ‘safer’ we’ll all be in our beds.
Take a look at the lamentable performances so far of virtually all of the vast computerisation schemes installed to date. But you can bet that Tony’s mates will do quite nicely thank you.
As to the PMS not having ‘seen’ the survey. Well no change there, then. Selective blindness and deafness seems regularly to strike behind the walls of Downing Street. It’s highly infectious, too, as other Government Departments seem to be badly affected. These people need some sort of ‘help’ and medical care.
Comment by Chuck Unsworth — 15 Jun 2005 on 11:10 am | LinkWell… most of the 9/11 hijackers had passports.
All ID cards will do is cause us inconvenience, turn us into a police state… and do NOTHING to make us any safer.
Funny… Downing street seems to be very quiet about the Iraq invasion at the moment as where it usually would be trumping terrorism/etc. as the reason for these ID cards. (maybe they’re avoiding the minutes being brought up right now?) – who knows?
Comment by Tim Leonard — 15 Jun 2005 on 11:49 am | LinkAre we really sure the Government can make it work.?
Comment by John Smith — 15 Jun 2005 on 5:10 pm | LinkThere is no evidence from their many other (failed) projects that they have the wherewithall to run it successfully