Hunting Vote
« Prime Minister Allawi visit | Back to most recent briefing | Northern Ireland Talks »
Questioned on why the Prime Minister had not voted last night, the PMOS said that the Prime Minister had had other engagements yesterday, which we had been carrying out. It had been clear that both the vote on the ban was going to be carried and that also the vote for the delay was going to be carried. The Prime Minister had been absolutely clear that the delay had been needed to give industry time to adapt. The Prime Minister’s strong preference had been to reach a compromise, and that was why he had strongly supported the efforts of Alun Michael in the many weeks and hours Alun Michael had spent trying to negotiate a compromise and that was why the Prime Minister regretted that a compromise had not been reached.
Briefing took place at 15:45 | Search for related news
« Prime Minister Allawi visit | Back to most recent briefing | Northern Ireland Talks »
Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is
reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's
Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is
reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most
up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original
source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions.
Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright
Downing Street Says.
|
To use the Parliament act to force through legistlation that the Prime Minister can be bothered to vote for?
Comment by Colonel Mad — 18 Sep 2004 on 8:42 am | LinkLet’s use plain English.
"The PM did not like the fact that MPs had opted for a total ban and did not want to be seen to be voting for a total ban so he made sure he was elsewhere at the time of the vote," said the PMOS.
Comment by Roger Huffadine — 18 Sep 2004 on 1:12 pm | LinkRight then!
Lets be honist!
The PM saw that fox hunting is in no way cruel and should not be banned, but he could not revoke the ban because this would cause uproar by “Anti Hunters” So he decided that the best he could do was to not ban Hunting entirely!
Comment by Steve Bosley — 23 Oct 2008 on 9:34 am | Link