» Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Ken Clarke

Asked if the Prime Minister was surprised that Ken Clarke had not apologised, the Prime Minister’s Spokesman (PMS) said the Justice Secretary had given further interviews to clarify. He was not suggesting in any way that some rapes were not serious.

Asked if the Prime Minister thought that Ken Clarke needed to apologise, the PMS said the Prime Minister believed that rape was a very serious crime and that serious crimes deserved serious punishments. He said that we were consulting on the issue of plea bargains and would set out details of that policy in due course. The PMS went on to confirm that the Prime Minister had confidence in the Justice Secretary.

Asked if the Prime Minister accepted the comments made by the Justice Secretary were deeply offensive, the PMS said that if people had been offended by the comments, it was regrettable.

Asked if the policy has already been decided, the PMS said we were still listening to people’s views. The details of the policy would be announced in due course.

Asked why Ken Clarke considered his remarks a misinterpretation, the PMS said Ken Clarke was trying to make the point that there are different tariffs in different cases. The PMS went on to say that what those tariffs are and what sentence should be applied in a particular case is a matter for the courts.

Asked about the Prime Minister’s response to Ken Clarke’s comments, the PMS said the Prime Minister and Justice Secretary felt it was important to clarify the position.

Asked if shorter sentences were about making the administration of law cheaper, the PMS said that plea bargaining has a role in the justice system, as it does in other justice systems around the world including some that are viewed as tough such as the United States. The PMS added that what we were trying to do was to improve the criminal justice system and make sure it worked effectively to reduce the high rates of reoffending, and to improve the rates of conviction.

original source.

Briefing took place at 10:00 | Search for related news

1 Comment »

  1. Pathetic. “…if people had been offended by the comments, it was regrettable” This implies it was the fault of those who were offended and not Clarke for making offensive comments in the first place. The question was about whether the comments were offensive and not whether people misinterpreted them. Cameron has failed to distance himself from this obnoxious views and is all the weaker for it. Wheeling out the PMS is another example of this. Come on PM, let’s hear what you think!!

    Clarke’s views were disgusting he has only clarified them not withdrawn them. He either thinks that some rape is more serious than others or he does not. If the former, then he should clearly be sacked because these views are out of step with modern thinking. If the latter, he should also be sacked, because it makes him incompetent and incapable of expressing himself. Hardly a good trait in a politician! Either way he should be sacked and that Cameron is too scared to do it demonstrates his own weakness.

    Comment by Jonathan Lewis — 23 May 2011 on 11:44 am | Link

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Post a public comment

(You must give an email address, but it will not be displayed to the public.)
(You may give your website, and it will be displayed to the public.)


This is not a way of contacting the Prime Minister. If you would like to contact the Prime Minister, go to the 10 Downing Street official site.

Privacy note: Shortly after posting, your name and comment will be displayed on the site. This means that people searching for your name on the Internet will be able to find and read your comment.

Downing Street Says...

The unofficial site which lets you comment on the UK Prime Minister's official briefings. About us...


May 2011
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Apr   Jun »

Supported by


Disruptive Proactivity

Recent Briefings



Syndicate (RSS/XML)



Contact Sam Smith.

This site is powered by WordPress. Theme by Jag Singh