» Thursday, May 5, 2011

Super-Injunctions

Asked if the Prime Minister had a view on MPs using Parliamentary privilege to circumvent the super-injunction law, the PMS replied that she was not aware of the Prime Minister expressing a view on the issue, but he had expressed a view on privacy laws and had made clear that they should be looked at.

Put that the Prime Minister had said that he felt uneasy’ about super-injunctions and would he therefore feel the same way about an MP taking one out, the PMS said that the Prime Minister was making a general point about super-injunctions.

Put that it was now public knowledge that an MP had taken a super-injunction out and how did the Prime Minister feel about that, the PMS replied that the Prime Minister had not commented specifically on the matter. The PMS added that she would not comment on a specific case, but the Prime Minister had set out the Government position; there was a question about privacy and the way our system works. Judges had been using the European Convention of Human Rights to deliver a privacy law without Parliament saying so.

Asked what the Government was doing on the matter at the moment, the PMS said that the Ministry of Justice were currently looking into the issue. The PMS said that more generally, the Government was backing reform of the ECHR. Ken Clarke at a conference last week had set out the need for reform and we would be looking at that before taking on the Presidency in November.

Asked if the Prime Minister was suggesting that MPs shouldn’t resort to court orders if they had something to hide, the PMS said that the Prime Minister had said that politicians were properly challenged, but the issue regarding super-injunctions was something that should be looked at.

Asked for more detail on what MOJ were currently working on, the PMS said that the Government recognised the importance of finding the correct balance between individual rights to privacy on the one hand, with rights to freedom of expression and transparency of official information on the other.

The Government’s proposed reforms of the law of defamation were one aspect of this balancing process. Another was the Master of the Rolls review, which would examine the use of super-injunctions and other issues relating to injunctions which bind the press and we were waiting for that report. Asked when the report would be published, the PMS advised that it would be published soon.

On whether a change in the law would be possible in the UK or would any change need to be ratified by the EU, the PMS said that this issue was being looked at by the Master of the Rolls Committee. There were also broader issues regarding the reform of the European Court, which we wanted to push forward, but needed the support of the rest of Europe.

original source.

Briefing took place at 15:45 | Search for related news

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Post a public comment

(You must give an email address, but it will not be displayed to the public.)
(You may give your website, and it will be displayed to the public.)

Comments:

This is not a way of contacting the Prime Minister. If you would like to contact the Prime Minister, go to the 10 Downing Street official site.

Privacy note: Shortly after posting, your name and comment will be displayed on the site. This means that people searching for your name on the Internet will be able to find and read your comment.

Downing Street Says...

The unofficial site which lets you comment on the UK Prime Minister's official briefings. About us...

Search


May 2011
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Apr   Jun »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Supported by

mySociety.org

Disruptive Proactivity

Recent Briefings


Archives

Links

Syndicate (RSS/XML)

Credits

Enquiries

Contact Sam Smith.

This site is powered by WordPress. Theme by Jag Singh