» Thursday, May 5, 2011Super-Injunctions
Asked if the Prime Minister had a view on MPs using Parliamentary privilege to circumvent the super-injunction law, the PMS replied that she was not aware of the Prime Minister expressing a view on the issue, but he had expressed a view on privacy laws and had made clear that they should be looked at. Put that the Prime Minister had said that he felt uneasy’ about super-injunctions and would he therefore feel the same way about an MP taking one out, the PMS said that the Prime Minister was making a general point about super-injunctions. Put that it was now public knowledge that an MP had taken a super-injunction out and how did the Prime Minister feel about that, the PMS replied that the Prime Minister had not commented specifically on the matter. The PMS added that she would not comment on a specific case, but the Prime Minister had set out the Government position; there was a question about privacy and the way our system works. Judges had been using the European Convention of Human Rights to deliver a privacy law without Parliament saying so. Asked what the Government was doing on the matter at the moment, the PMS said that the Ministry of Justice were currently looking into the issue. The PMS said that more generally, the Government was backing reform of the ECHR. Ken Clarke at a conference last week had set out the need for reform and we would be looking at that before taking on the Presidency in November. Asked if the Prime Minister was suggesting that MPs shouldn’t resort to court orders if they had something to hide, the PMS said that the Prime Minister had said that politicians were properly challenged, but the issue regarding super-injunctions was something that should be looked at. Asked for more detail on what MOJ were currently working on, the PMS said that the Government recognised the importance of finding the correct balance between individual rights to privacy on the one hand, with rights to freedom of expression and transparency of official information on the other. The Government’s proposed reforms of the law of defamation were one aspect of this balancing process. Another was the Master of the Rolls review, which would examine the use of super-injunctions and other issues relating to injunctions which bind the press and we were waiting for that report. Asked when the report would be published, the PMS advised that it would be published soon. On whether a change in the law would be possible in the UK or would any change need to be ratified by the EU, the PMS said that this issue was being looked at by the Master of the Rolls Committee. There were also broader issues regarding the reform of the European Court, which we wanted to push forward, but needed the support of the rest of Europe. Briefing took place at 15:45 | Search for related news Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions. Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright Downing Street Says. |
The unofficial site which lets you comment on the UK Prime Minister's official briefings. About us...
Search
Supported byRecent Briefings
Archives
LinksSyndicate (RSS/XML)CreditsEnquiriesContact Sam Smith. |
No Comments »
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Post a public comment