» Wednesday, March 3, 2010

President Zuma

Asked if the timing of President Zuma’s official welcoming was something that the Prime Minister was consulted on and if it was right that the welcoming couldn’t be moved to this afternoon because the Prime Minister had another event, the Prime Minister’s Spokesman (PMS) said that he wouldn’t say that the event he had this afternoon would stand in the way of a change of time. These things were done both in consultation with the Palace and also in consultation with opposition parties. These events were planned a long time in advance and once the timing was in place, the timing was in place. The Prime Minister was very keen to do what was expected in a situation like this The Leader of the House had taken PMQs on a number of times previously, so there was nothing to read into it, other than the fact this was an important state visit.

Asked why the Prime Minister was attending President Zuma’s welcoming ceremony when he was Head of Government not Head of State, the PMS said that this was an official ceremony and it was always the case that the Head of Government would be at the receiving ceremony for a visiting Head of State; it was part of a longstanding protocol.

Put that the fact the Prime Minister was missing PMQs could be seen as contempt for Parliament, the PMS rejected any suggestion that the Prime Minister did anything but hold the Houses of Parliament in the highest regard. These events were detailed on a minute-by-minute basis and once they were set it was difficult to change the timing. The opposition parties had been consulted, as they always were, and they understood that these things happened; it was not the first time a change like this had taken place. There was a recent occasion when we returned from an international visit and it made sense for the Leader of the House to step in for the Prime Minister at PMQs due to timing.

Put that the Opposition had accused the Prime Minister of ducking it, the PMS said that he had not seen that comment and that he would be very surprised if they had made any official comment as they had been consulted. There was a very clear protocol around this; we would not go into the exact timing of when and how it happened but we could assure people that the opposition parties were consulted on exactly the same basis that they would have been on previous occasions.

Asked if No 10 had asked for the date to be changed in advance, the PMS said these events were meticulously planned a long time in advance and it was entirely appropriate that the Prime Minister should be at the ceremony.

Asked if No 10 had been involved in the planning, the PMS said that state visits were planned by Buckingham Palace; No 10 knew about the diary dates but we did not get involved in the ceremony, which was the responsibility of the Comptroller of the House in consultation with the Lord Chamberlain.

Asked if the Prime Minister had spent a large part of the morning looking at documents ahead of the Iraq inquiry, the PMS said that we did not comment on everything the Prime Minister did day to day. Clearly he would be preparing, as he did for every event, but he had plenty of other business underway.

Asked what the Prime Minister thought of President Zuma’s comments during an interview that he saw the British as condescending imperialists , the PMS said that he had not seen that comment and that we were very much looking forward to welcoming the Head of State from South Africa. A large contingent of business people were travelling with President Zuma; we had important cultural, business and other links with South Africa and a number of British companies were major investors in South Africa and vice versa. It was a very welcome State visit by a very important member of the international community.

Asked for the Prime Minister’s view on polygamy, the PMS said that the Prime Minister would not offer a few on anyone’s personal life in that respect.

original source.

Briefing took place at 10:00 | Search for related news

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Post a public comment

(You must give an email address, but it will not be displayed to the public.)
(You may give your website, and it will be displayed to the public.)

Comments:

This is not a way of contacting the Prime Minister. If you would like to contact the Prime Minister, go to the 10 Downing Street official site.

Privacy note: Shortly after posting, your name and comment will be displayed on the site. This means that people searching for your name on the Internet will be able to find and read your comment.

Downing Street Says...

The unofficial site which lets you comment on the UK Prime Minister's official briefings. About us...

Search


March 2010
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Feb   Apr »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Supported by

mySociety.org

Disruptive Proactivity

Recent Briefings


Archives

Links

Syndicate (RSS/XML)

Credits

Enquiries

Contact Sam Smith.

This site is powered by WordPress. Theme by Jag Singh