» Monday, February 25, 2008Speaker of the House of Commons
Asked if the Prime Minister shared the concerns of his Parliamentary colleagues regarding the witch-hunt against the Speaker, the PMS replied that he would not get into that subject. However, the Prime Minister had said a few words about the Speaker during his visit this morning. The gist of what was said was that the Prime Minister thought Michael Martin was a good Speaker but that these were all matters for the House Authorities. Briefing took place at 11:00 | Search for related news Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions. Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright Downing Street Says. |
The unofficial site which lets you comment on the UK Prime Minister's official briefings. About us...
Search
Supported byRecent BriefingsArchives
LinksSyndicate (RSS/XML)CreditsEnquiriesContact Sam Smith. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To whom it may concern,
As a life-long labour voter I would be interested to hear your views on the latest ’scandal’ regarding MP’s expenses for second homes.
Much has been made of the fact that MP’s need to have a home in London as well as their constituency, therefore claiming expenses for a second home is a ‘legitimate’ part of the job. But is it fair? And if it is, why do some MP’s object to it being made public?
I would like to point out that many people have to work away from home to earn a decent living, (often much less than an MPs salary), and therefore have to pay to live somewhere else during the week. Although, some expenses can be offset against tax, ordinary people have to fund their ’second home’ themselves.
My husband worked away from home some years ago, and still does so from time to time. The only ’second home’ he can afford is either a caravan or a budget B&B.
What really annoys me is the fact that although I earn less than £6,000 per year, I am contributing towards these ridiculous expenses.
I believe MP’s receive around £60,000+ per annum, which makes a mockery of my meagre wage from Blackpool Borough Council. I think we are in line for a 2.4% rise this year, which will mean an extra £2.49 a week for me. Taking into consideration the rises in council tax, water rates and gas, electric and diesel, I will actually be worse off. If only I could claim my expenses.
I work in a local high school, formatting work for visually impaired children - a worthwhile job I’m sure you would agree, but quite obviously not as worthwhile as an MP’s.
I choose to work part-time because my youngest child is only 9 and my job enables me to take him to and from school and have the school holidays with him. My husband is self-employed and works full time (when he has enough work).
We have three children, two of whom are grown-up and work full-time and pay their taxes. I, like many other people are fed up at what we feel is an unfair system.
I look forward to your reply on this matter, and also I would be interested to see if you are willing to make public any expenses that you claim for your second home.
Yours faithfully,
Julie Spence
71 St Albans Road
Blackpool
FY1 4EG
Comment by JULIE SPENCE — 5 Apr 2008 on 12:01 am | Link