<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Electoral Reform</title>
	<link>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2007/05/02/4096</link>
	<description>Every day the Prime Minister's Spokesman meets a small coterie of political journalists known as 'the lobby' for a topical chat, or 'briefing'.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 04:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: john.L</title>
		<link>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2007/05/02/4096#comment-6359</link>
		<author>john.L</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 13:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2007/05/02/4096#comment-6359</guid>
		<description> &#34;Even more secure&#34; (P.M) laugh! thought i'd never start.
Postal voting fraud questions asked, but we have now moved on from that cock-up to the next, over spoilt ballot papers in Scotland (basic mistakes on the layout of forms + another expensive I.T.system which does not work). Postal fraud in the last elections resulted in a High Court Judge saying our electoral system was, Quote: &#34;Enough to shame a Banana Republic&#34;. These Politicians obviously have not got a clue about information technology so i suggest they stick to the tried, trusted and tested method of balloting, your name is cross referenced with the electoral list then you use an H.B. pencil to place an X on a piece of paper against the candidate of your choice these are then counted by a machine that works (people) sounds logical to me, &#34;if it ain't broke don't fix it&#34;, NOT: &#34;it work's fine so we'll **** It&#34;. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Even more secure&quot; (P.M) laugh! thought i&#8217;d never start.<br />
Postal voting fraud questions asked, but we have now moved on from that cock-up to the next, over spoilt ballot papers in Scotland (basic mistakes on the layout of forms + another expensive I.T.system which does not work). Postal fraud in the last elections resulted in a High Court Judge saying our electoral system was, Quote: &quot;Enough to shame a Banana Republic&quot;. These Politicians obviously have not got a clue about information technology so i suggest they stick to the tried, trusted and tested method of balloting, your name is cross referenced with the electoral list then you use an H.B. pencil to place an X on a piece of paper against the candidate of your choice these are then counted by a machine that works (people) sounds logical to me, &quot;if it ain&#8217;t broke don&#8217;t fix it&quot;, NOT: &quot;it work&#8217;s fine so we&#8217;ll **** It&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john.L</title>
		<link>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2007/05/02/4096#comment-6358</link>
		<author>john.L</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 13:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2007/05/02/4096#comment-6358</guid>
		<description> &#34;Even more secure&#34; (P.M) laugh! thought i'd never start.
Postal voting fraud questions asked, but we have now moved on from that cock-up to the next, over spoilt ballot papers in Scotland (basic mistakes on the layout of forms + another expensive I.T.system which does not work). Postal fraud in the last elections resulted in a High Court Judge saying our electoral system was, Quote: &#34;Enough to shame a Banana Republic&#34;. These Politicians obviously have not got a clue about information technology so i suggest they stick to the tried, trusted and tested method of balloting, your name is cross referenced with the electoral list then you use an H.B. pencil to place an X on a piece of paper against the candidate of your choice these are then counted by a machine that works (people) sounds logical to me, &#34;if it ain't broke don't fix it&#34;, NOT: &#34;it work's fine so we'll **** It&#34;. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Even more secure&quot; (P.M) laugh! thought i&#8217;d never start.<br />
Postal voting fraud questions asked, but we have now moved on from that cock-up to the next, over spoilt ballot papers in Scotland (basic mistakes on the layout of forms + another expensive I.T.system which does not work). Postal fraud in the last elections resulted in a High Court Judge saying our electoral system was, Quote: &quot;Enough to shame a Banana Republic&quot;. These Politicians obviously have not got a clue about information technology so i suggest they stick to the tried, trusted and tested method of balloting, your name is cross referenced with the electoral list then you use an H.B. pencil to place an X on a piece of paper against the candidate of your choice these are then counted by a machine that works (people) sounds logical to me, &quot;if it ain&#8217;t broke don&#8217;t fix it&quot;, NOT: &quot;it work&#8217;s fine so we&#8217;ll **** It&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
