» Thursday, April 26, 2007Private Members Bill / Freedom of Information Act
The Leader, asked if he had a view of the Bill before MPs again tomorrow, said that the Government’s approach - to treat it as a House matter - was entirely appropriate. He recalled that, when the original White Paper had been published on Freedom of Information, there was an exemption for Parliament, as was the case in many other jurisdictions for special reasons connected with parliamentary privilege and such matters - not because of a desire to keep information covered up. Briefing took place at 15:00 | Search for related news Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions. Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright Downing Street Says. |
The unofficial site which lets you comment on the UK Prime Minister's official briefings. About us...
Search
Supported byRecent Briefings
Archives
LinksSyndicate (RSS/XML)CreditsEnquiriesContact Sam Smith. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This is outrageous, the Leader of the House is saying that the Freedom of Information Act was intended to be a worthless piece of paper from its inception. It was understood that there would be an exemption for Parliament? (who else are we concerned about). Seems to be a problem in understanding the meaning of the words "Freedom" and "Information".
Comment by simon — 2 May 2007 on 12:36 pm | Link