» Friday, April 20, 2007Freedom of Information Act
Asked if the Government was concerned that if David McLean’s Bill went through, it might undermine the Freedom of Information legislation, the PMS replied that as the Leader of the House had made clear yesterday, this was a Parliamentary issue for Parliament to discuss, and we did not think it appropriate for the Government to stand in the way of such a debate. The PMS added that she was not going to get into a clearly hypothetical question. Briefing took place at 9:00 | Search for related news Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions. Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright Downing Street Says. |
The unofficial site which lets you comment on the UK Prime Minister's official briefings. About us...
Search
Supported byRecent Briefings
Archives
LinksSyndicate (RSS/XML)CreditsEnquiriesContact Sam Smith. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I am outraged that Westminster MP’s, supposedly the custodians of democracy,have voted to exempt themselves from the Freedom of Information Law. The BBC TV scan of the near empty Parliament when the Conservative David Mclean MP’s Private Members Bill was discussed said everything to me.
Comment by Richard Pritchard — 19 May 2007 on 4:48 am | LinkThis was a conspiracy of like-minded MP’s of all political parties and to hell with the voting public.
I can only imagine the glee and backslapping that went on in the Government’s Labour Party when this was going on. What was Cameron thinking about to allow this? Has he got things he wants to hide as well as Blair/Brown?
Comment was apparently made by the Leader of the House that "it was an issue for Parliament to discuss". Where was Parliament? Had MP’s of all colours possibly scuttled home for another early weekend ,after a debilitating three and a half days work in order to be seen as not to have voted for this? Where and when was the discussion?