Downing Street Says » Police Inquiry

Asked if the Government was considering a review of the Contempt of Court Act 1981, as the Attorney General appeared to be unhappy, the PMOS said that this was a matter for the Attorney General. The PMOS said that he was not aware of anything along those lines, but people would be reflecting on the events of the past few days.

Put that the Prime Minister had given a rather short answer to Sir Menzies Campbell at PMQs today on the splitting up of the Attorney General’s role, and what was the Prime Minister’s thinking about the Attorney General’s role, the PMOS said that the answer may have been short, but the intention was clear.

Asked for clarification about what was meant by the fact that Lord Levy’s role was "unchanged", and was he still actively involved, and did he still use his office and the officials at the FCO, the PMOS replied that it was an ongoing role, and in that sense, it remained an unchanged role. We did not brief on it in detail precisely because it was a role that involved private conversations with all sides in the Middle East. If people wanted to know more about how the Prime Minister saw that, the best way was to look at the press conference in Ramallah. The Prime Minister had set out not just what it was that he thought Lord Levy brought to the role, but also, why he valued it.

Put that the BBC this afternoon were trying to expose the details of the original injunction and the restrictions involved, and did No10 have any view, the PMOS replied that we had no view because first and foremost, this was an injunction that the Metropolitan Police requested of the Attorney General and had nothing to do with us. Therefore, given that it had nothing to do with us in its origin, it was nothing to do with us now.

Asked further about the injunction, the PMOS said that it was entirely a matter for the Attorney General and for others to consider, not him.

Put that the Attorney General had implied in an interview today that Downing Street and the Metropolitan Police were "not the best of friends" and were we aware of any frustrations, the PMOS replied that as we had frequently said, the Met Police had a job to do. We believed that they should be allowed to get on with that job without leaks and without speculation or a running commentary on the investigation. As the PMOS had also said, he did not know where the leaks had come from; others in the room may have a better idea than he. Whatever the source, it was unhelpful, and we believed that it should not be happening, and we would certainly not do anything to add to the speculation. There were times when, as in earlier that week, to prevent a fundamental misconception becoming accepted fact, it was necessary to comment. Otherwise, we would try and keep comments to a minimum.

Asked if there were concerns regarding specific elements of the investigation, i.e., dawn raids, the PMOS went on to say that not only were we not going to give a running commentary, we were also not going to give marks out of ten to various events. The important thing was that the police investigation was allowed to carry on and that we should treat it like any other investigation, and the rules were very clear. People should not leak evidence as part of an investigation, and it should be carried on in a way that was not prejudicial to any of those involved.

Asked if we had had any official communication from Scotland Yard about not leaking, the PMOS said that the question came under the heading of giving a commentary, and he was not going to do that.

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Post a public comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required)
(You must give an email address, but it will not be displayed to the public.)
Website
(You may give your website, and it will be displayed to the public.)

Comments:

This is not a way of contacting the Prime Minister. If you would like to contact the Prime Minister, go to the 10 Downing Street official site.

Privacy note: Shortly after posting, your name and comment will be displayed on the site. This means that people searching for your name on the Internet will be able to find and read your comment.

Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions. Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright Downing Street Says.

» Wednesday, March 7, 2007

Police Inquiry

No Comments »

Post a public comment

Search

Supported by

Recent Briefings

Archives

Links

Syndicate (RSS/XML)

Credits

Enquiries