» Tuesday, December 19, 2006Police Inquiry
Asked if anyone in Downing Street had been in contact with Yates of the Yard with regard to any future interviews, the PMOS said there was nothing further to add. Asked if there was any likelihood of a further visit by the police the PMOS said he was not aware and it was after all a matter for the police. Briefing took place at 15:00 | Search for related news Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions. Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright Downing Street Says. |
The unofficial site which lets you comment on the UK Prime Minister's official briefings. About us...
Search
Supported byRecent Briefings
Archives
LinksSyndicate (RSS/XML)CreditsEnquiriesContact Sam Smith. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
are police allowed to harrass and intimidate ,send out information to stop someones working life,hide behind office protocol,give out the wrong information to stop themselves being convicted,tamper with evidence and witnesses,in order to gain a conviction,allow the public a say in a conviction,who are not members of the government,
(Report comment as abusive?)
Comment by neil scott — 28 Dec 2006 on 1:31 pm | Linkif anyone is interested ask ipcc about neil scott from middlesbrough
(Report comment as abusive?)
Comment by neil scott — 28 Dec 2006 on 1:52 pm | Link748 ipcc complaints under the mayor ray mallon corruption collects corruption by police if backed up by a corrupt criminal mayor
(Report comment as abusive?)
Comment by neil scott — 1 May 2009 on 11:18 am | Link7years of abuses under ray mallon criminal mayor,drug dealers buying houses,setting up buisnesses,doorstaff assaults never convicted,police falsifying evidence and interferance with the course of justice,lost evidences,evidence interfered with,abused childrens rights to protect them under the child protection acts,criminals advertised in public a breach of the rehabilitation act,more unemployment,more crime than before2002,benefits stopped to show figures of unemployed down,and crime down,and the cause of deprevation towards the innocents,data abuses in the crb disclosures towards neil scottcouncil tax benefits/rents stopped without good reason,falsified evidence in a speeding allegation in january 09,against neil scott,quashed case received his licence back clean on 201109,10 months later,forced depravation aginst the innocents of middelsbrough,no plans in 7 years to get roadworks done until 5mths before he is due for an election again,251109 police wardens sat in a library on computers instead of policing southbank,mallon criminal failed as a cheif police officer,a defective detective and a mayor role with flawed pilot schemes,who knows the police wardens mite be in my library to delete what ive said towards them,21 arrests over 7years ,it takes one person to look into it before im imprisoned for a crime i did not commit again,i still have only 1 minor conviction in 43 years,my rents stopped my council tax stopped my benefits,jsa, stopped,im not allowed to have my solicitor defend me and im on leagal aid,all before the court case on 02,12,09,this is serious missconduct that ive been executed before a court outcome,that is criminal missconduct by all authourities of middlesbrough under criminal ray mallon mayor of middlesbrough ,operation lancett enquiree ,corruption still exsists in middlesbrough under ray mallon,
(Report comment as abusive?)
Comment by NEIL SCOTT — 25 Nov 2009 on 5:01 pm | Linkas if a police inquiree is going to be mnade by any officials in labour government,over 800 compliants were made to ipcc against cleveland police force in 2009,none of them were upheld,2 deaths in cells without good reasonnable excuses by officers on duty neil scott provided evidence that custody records were altered to state no incidents happened on the 27,08,06,when neil scott was held in cuustody unconscoius and a broken jaw and denied medical assistance he was left in cells to die attempted murder by cleveland opfficers chalmers and detective sgt cook
(Report comment as abusive?)
Comment by neil scott — 2 Dec 2009 on 6:41 pm | Linknothing can be used against me in a court because its all true
(Report comment as abusive?)
Comment by neil scott — 10 Dec 2009 on 6:15 pm | Linkthis is all publicised already on any site,its also facts of my own cases
(Report comment as abusive?)
Comment by neilscott — 24 Feb 2010 on 3:18 pm | Link18,000 personal records from the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP): In December
2007, it was revealed that 18,000 personal records were found at a former DWP contractor’s
home. The contractor still had unencrypted compact discs containing the details of thousands
of benefit claimants, despite having stopped working for the DWP a year before. The two discs
held up to 9,000 names each (BBC Online, 1 December 2007).
• DVLA data:In December 2007 Transport Secretary, Ruth Kelly, was forced to admit that the
personal details of more than three million learner drivers had gone missing. The names,
addresses and telephone numbers for every candidate who applied for a driving theory test
between September 2004 and April 2007 were on a computer hard drive which was lost in May
at a supposedly secure facility in the US. (Hansard, 17 Dec 2007, Column 624)
• MOD data:In January 2008, it emerged that a laptop computer containing the details of
600,000 people was stolen from the MOD. The laptop listed the personal information of
recruits to the Royal Navy, Royal Marines and Royal Air Force, and of others who had
expressed an interest in joining. It contained passport details, national insurance numbers,
drivers’ licence information, family details, doctors’ addresses and NHS numbers. The
Ministry of Defence said the laptop was stolen from a Royal Navy officer’s car parked in
Birmingham on 9 January but it had decided – after consulting the police – not to disclose the
theft immediately. Defence Secretary, Des Browne, later admitted the loss of two further
laptops containing more sensitive information (Hansard, 21 Jan 2008, Column 1225)
• MoD admits 658 laptops stolen: Defence Secretary Des Browne was forced to re-issue and
revise upwards previous estimates of the number of laptops stolen from 347 to 658 in the last
four years after ‘anomalies in the reporting process’ were discovered. In addition the MoD said
that 89 laptops had been lost. The department also said that 26 portable memory sticks
containing classified information had been either stolen or misplaced since January. In a
separate response, ministers said that 131 of the department’s USB memory sticks had been
taken or misplaced since 2004 (The Telegraph, 19 July 2008).
• National DNA database: Under Labour, the National DNA database has grown to five million
samples, the largest in the world per head of population. The costs of service delivery have
doubled since 2002, when the rules were changed to allow permanent retention of innocent
people’s DNA (National DNA Database Annual Report 2006/7). Yet, total detected crimes in
which a DNA match was available have dropped by 16.5 per cent between 2002-03 and 2007-08
(Hansard, 4 February 2009, Column 1244WA). There are thought to be a million innocent
people on the database and yet there are over two million people with a police record without a
profile on the DNA database (Hansard, 5 November 2008, Column 602WA). In 2008, the
European Court of Human Rights held that the government’s arbitrary approach breached the
right to privacy (S. and Marper v. United Kingdom, 4 December 2008). The Government has
long ignored calls from the Conservatives for a Parliamentary debate on the database and for it to
be put on a proper statutory footing. In May 2009, and despite the Marperruling, it announced
that innocent people’s DNA would still be retained for a maximum period of 12 years.
(Report comment as abusive?)
Comment by neil scott — 8 Mar 2010 on 4:47 pm | Link